刑事证据审查的基本制度结构

发布时间：2018-01-24 06:50

本文关键词： 证据准入证据审查定案根据证明力印证　出处：《中国法学》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：现代刑事证据审查体系是以"证据准入—证据评估相分离"为核心特征,由术语范畴、审查主体、审查标准与程序保障等多个维度构成的一个立体制度结构体系。多层次的立体制度结构体系有利于保障证据准入与证据评估的相对分离,从而确保刑事证据规则的有效实施。我国最新的刑事证据立法已经通过"材料—证据—定案根据"这三个基本范畴确立起证据准入的两道审查门槛。证据审查规范与相关审查范畴的对接彰显了在新形势下对刑事证据审查的进一步强化。我国证据审查制度还仅仅是一种相对扁平化的线性制度构建,审查范畴上的区分缺乏来自主体分离、程序设置和适用标准层面的支撑与保障。随着以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革的推进,我国刑事证据审查的制度体系也需要作出相应的调适。
[Abstract]:The modern criminal evidence review system is characterized by the separation of evidence admittance and evidence evaluation, which includes the category of terminology and the subject of examination. Review standards and procedural safeguards and other dimensions of a three-dimensional system of institutional structure system. The multi-level system of three-dimensional institutional structure is conducive to the protection of evidence access and evidence evaluation of the relative separation. In order to ensure the effective implementation of the criminal evidence rules. Our country's latest criminal evidence legislation has passed the "material-evidence-decision basis" These three basic categories establish two threshold of examination of evidence access. The docking between evidence review norm and relevant examination category highlights the further strengthening of criminal evidence review under the new situation. The evidence review system of our country is only. It is only a relatively flat linear system construction. The distinction in the category of review lacks the support and guarantee from the separation of subject, the setting of procedure and the level of applicable standard. With the advancement of the reform of litigation system with trial as the center. The system of our country's criminal evidence examination also needs to make the corresponding adjustment.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学证据科学教育部重点实验室;
【基金】：2011计划司法文明协同创新中心研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2
【正文快照】： 如何通过制度来实现对证据审查活动的有效规制,这是中外证据制度建构中都要直面的一个根本性问题。早在19世纪早期,英国哲学家边沁曾经发出这样的警告:“从事务本质上说,为证据寻找一种确保公正裁决的可靠规则是完全不可能的,人类的心智太过敏感以致无法建立规则,这些规则只能

【相似文献】