民事执行强制管理人的主体资格探析

发布时间：2018-01-24 11:16

本文关键词： 民事执行强制管理管理人主体资格　出处：《东岳论丛》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：管理人的性质为执行法院的辅助机关,其主体资格关系到民事执行强制管理的实际效果。我国现行规定局限于申请执行人担任管理人,无法适应司法实践的复杂状况。结合各地法院的探索经验,借鉴域外的相关规定,我国民事执行强制管理人的主体资格应从以下三个方面进行完善:管理人的选任裁定独立于强制管理开始的裁定,一般情形下应同时作出,特殊情形下应视实际状况尽快选任或更换管理人;执行员、债权人、债务人、具备专业资质的第三人均可担任管理人;债权人可以推荐合适的人选,执行法院为管理人制作选任证,以证明其资格。
[Abstract]:The nature of the administrator is the auxiliary organ of the executive court, and its subject qualification is related to the actual effect of the civil enforcement compulsory management. The current regulations of our country are limited to applying for the executor to act as the administrator. Can not adapt to the complex situation of judicial practice. Combined with the exploration experience of local courts, learn from the relevant provisions of foreign countries. The subject qualification of the civil enforcement compulsory administrator in China should be perfected from the following three aspects: the decision on the selection and appointment of the administrator is independent of the ruling at the beginning of compulsory management, and generally should be made at the same time. In special circumstances, managers should be selected or replaced as soon as possible according to the actual situation; An executor, a creditor, a debtor, and a third person with professional qualifications may act as administrators; The creditor may recommend a suitable candidate, and the execution court may make an election certificate for the administrator to prove his qualifications.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“迈向制度理性的民事程序研究”(项目号:FX028)
【分类号】：D925.1
【正文快照】： 近年来,民事执行机构的“社会参与”趋势愈演愈烈。由社会机构或个人而非国家机关直接实施执行措施,简言之,民事执行机构由社会主体参与已不可阻挡。社会参与民事执行能够有效制约执行权的“滥用”和“乱用”,同时调动社会部分力量参与执行,节约司法资源,增强民事执行“信任度

【相似文献】