当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

我国检察职权配置研究

发布时间:2018-01-24 15:16

  本文关键词: 司法改革 检察职权 法律监督 检察职权配置 完善 出处:《淮北师范大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:检察职权配置是司法职权配置的重要内容,也是司法改革的重要环节。检察职权的有效运行,很大程度上决定着我国司法体制的建立、健全与完善。然而检察职权实际运作过程中受到多方干扰,导致检察职权不能有效行使。目前,我国检察职权配置存在诸多问题,主要有内部和外部两方面因素影响检察职权配置的优化,文章将检察机关定性为法律监督机关,基于此,笔者以司法改革为视角,剖析检察职权配置中存在的法律问题和配置不足。通过完善立法、改革检察体制、优化职能范围、提升检察机关司法权威及公信力等相关措施,优化检察职权配置,防止权力滥用。本文分为六个部分:第一章:通过论述检察权的性质是司法权,检察制度是由人类发展而来为背景。我国从清末检察制度的引进到司法改革中检察职权配置,我国检察职权存在的配置缺陷,一直是法学理论界研究的课题。结合国内外关于检察职权配置研究现状,试图系统分析出我国检察职权配置缺陷,探寻司法改革的良方。第二章:理论分析检察职权的法理基础是受到西方权力制约理论的影响,保障法律的统一适用和促进司法公正同时作为检察职权配置的法理基础,为检察职权设置与改革提供理论支持。宪法性文件对检察职权配置的定位、诉讼法的分散规定,以及检察院组织法的细化,都对检察职权的法律性质做了自上而下的规定。第三章:论述司法改革视角下我国检察职权配置存在的法律问题,从外部权力干涉检察职权配置和内部权力配置缺陷两大方面出发分析原因,强调加快检察职权配置的完善,以提高我国司法公正性。第四章:论述在司法改革视角下优化检察职权配置的建议宜从完善宪法出发,修改完善相关法律规范,保障检察职权配置的合理性。同时改革完善检察体制、优化检察职权职能范围以及提升检察机关司法权威及公信力。第五章:鉴于检察职权配置是为提高司法公正,然而检察机关作为法律监督机关享有监督其他机关的权力,但是监督检察职权配置过程的机制应不断完善。本章为扩大司法公开范围、开放新媒体监督平台、强化纪检部门监督权三个方面探寻检察职权滥用的监督制约机制。第六部分:结语。
[Abstract]:The allocation of procuratorial power is an important part of judicial power allocation and also an important link of judicial reform. The effective operation of procuratorial power determines to a great extent the establishment of judicial system in our country. Perfect and perfect. However, there are many interference in the actual operation of procuratorial power, leading to the procuratorial power can not be effectively exercised. At present, there are many problems in the allocation of procuratorial power in China. There are two main internal and external factors affecting the optimization of procuratorial power allocation, the article will determine the procuratorial organ as a legal supervision organ, based on this, the author takes judicial reform as the perspective. Through perfecting the legislation, reforming the procuratorial system, optimizing the scope of functions, improving the judicial authority and credibility of procuratorial organs and other relevant measures. This paper is divided into six parts: the first chapter: by discussing the nature of procuratorial power is judicial power. The procuratorial system comes from the human development background. From the introduction of the procuratorial system in the late Qing Dynasty to the judicial reform, the allocation of procuratorial power in China is flawed. It has always been a research topic in the field of legal theory. Combined with the present situation of the domestic and foreign research on the allocation of procuratorial powers, this paper tries to systematically analyze the defects of the allocation of procuratorial powers in China. The second chapter: theoretical analysis of procuratorial powers of the legal basis is affected by the western theory of power constraints. Guarantee the unified application of the law and promote judicial justice as the legal basis for the allocation of procuratorial powers, and provide theoretical support for the establishment and reform of procuratorial powers. The decentralized provisions of the procedure law and the refinement of the law on the organization of the Public Prosecutor's Office. The third chapter discusses the legal problems existing in the disposition of procuratorial power in China from the perspective of judicial reform. From the external power interference procuratorial power allocation and internal power allocation defects from two major aspects of the analysis of reasons, emphasizing on speeding up the improvement of procuratorial power allocation. In order to improve the judicial fairness of our country. Chapter 4th: to discuss how to optimize the disposition of procuratorial powers from the perspective of judicial reform, from the point of view of improving the constitution, to modify and perfect the relevant legal norms. At the same time, we should reform and perfect the procuratorial system. Optimize the scope of procuratorial functions and enhance the judicial authority and credibility of procuratorial organs. Chapter 5th: since the allocation of procuratorial powers is to improve judicial justice. However, the procuratorial organ, as a legal supervision organ, has the power to supervise other organs, but the mechanism of supervising the disposition of procuratorial power should be improved continuously. This chapter is to expand the scope of judicial publicity and open the new media supervision platform. Strengthen the supervision power of discipline inspection departments from three aspects to explore the supervision and restriction mechanism of the abuse of procuratorial power. Part 6th: conclusion.
【学位授予单位】:淮北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张智辉;;检察改革要以检察职权优化配置为核心[J];河南社会科学;2011年03期

2 徐汉明;;我国检察职权优化配置的路径选择[J];人民检察;2010年03期

3 熊霞;;浅议检察职权配置的要求及实现途径[J];甘肃警察职业学院学报;2010年02期

4 赵开年;;论刑事检察职权之规训:以内部监督制约为视角[J];中国刑事法杂志;2010年09期

5 向泽选;;检察规律引领下的检察职权优化配置[J];政法论坛;2011年02期

6 施庆堂;;检察职权之变迁与展望[J];海峡法学;2010年03期

7 张朝霞;温军;贾晓文;;论检察职权内部配置的基础与路径[J];政法论坛;2009年01期

8 罗欣;晏磊;;案件集约管理:检察职权优化配置路径选择[J];人民检察;2011年24期

9 尚爱国;;试论我国检察职权的合理配置与完善[J];中国检察官;2009年07期

10 买买提·玉素甫;;接受人大监督 履行检察职权——在自治区党委人大工作会议上的发言[J];新疆人大;2002年01期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 熊霞;;检察职权科学配置研究——以特定重大犯罪案件检察职权的立法完善为视角[A];第五届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2009年

2 熊霞;;论检察职权配置的三个要求及其实现[A];第五届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2009年

3 李凯俊;李涛;;关于修改人民检察院组织法第五条检察职权的思考[A];第七届国家高级检察官论坛会议文章[C];2011年

相关重要报纸文章 前5条

1 山东省胶州市检察院检察长 牟永和;影响检察职权配置的三个因素[N];检察日报;2008年

2 李桂珍 记者 王吟;天柱县检察院“五主动、五禁止”为非公经济发展护航[N];贵州政协报;2010年

3 人民检察博物馆副馆长 国家检察官学院井冈山分院副院长 刘志成;人民检察职权的历史演进[N];检察日报;2011年

4 王洪录 记者 任小昌;苍溪检察官作出十二条廉政承诺[N];广元日报;2008年

5 记者 裴智勇;保管鉴定费用不得向当事人收取[N];人民日报;2006年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 刘俊;我国检察职权配置研究[D];淮北师范大学;2017年

2 解思思;我国检察职权研究[D];山东大学;2013年

3 黄红梅;从检察权的性质看检察职权的完善[D];苏州大学;2004年



本文编号:1460348

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1460348.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0343a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com