我国羁押事实的适用现状及其规范化

发布时间：2018-01-25 19:22

本文关键词： 羁押理由羁押事实程序性证明逮捕社会危险性　出处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国《刑事诉讼法》2012年修改后,形成了通过界定羁押事实,明确羁押理由,以降低未决羁押率的新思路。调查表明,羁押事实的运用实践性强,部分背离了法定羁押事实,其主要集中在有前科、无业、情节恶劣等情形,多为预防性羁押,否定羁押的事实主要为认罪态度好、和解、赔偿等情形。推高未决羁押率的主导因素包括,以外来人员、不退赔等作为强制性羁押事实;实践中羁押事实标准明显低于法定要求;羁押事实认定受制于被害人意见;羁押事实评估随意化;羁押事实以消极、否定性事实表述为主等。然而,实践中将不认罪、不赔偿、不退赃、不和解作为羁押事实,违反了不受强迫自证其罪原则;无业等消极羁押事实与积极妨碍诉讼行为的羁押理由相关性不足;将外来人员、在本地无固定住所作为羁押事实,容易造成地域歧视。未来的改革,应当扬弃实践性羁押事实,构建羁押事实的规范化评估体系。
[Abstract]:After the revision of our country's Criminal procedure Law in 2012, a new way of thinking was formed to reduce the rate of pending detention by defining the facts of custody and defining the reasons of detention. The investigation shows that the application of the facts of custody is very practical. Part of the departure from the fact of legal custody, mainly concentrated in criminal record, unemployed, bad circumstances and other situations, mostly for preventive custody, denial of the facts of detention is mainly guilty attitude, reconciliation. Compensation and other circumstances. The leading factors that push up the rate of pending detention include the fact of mandatory detention, such as foreign personnel, non-refund and compensation. In practice, the standard of detaining facts is obviously lower than the legal requirements; The fact of custody is subject to the victim's opinion; The evaluation of detention facts is arbitrary; The facts of custody are mainly negative and negative facts. However, in practice, the principle of not being forced to testify against oneself has been violated by not admitting guilt, not paying compensation, not returning stolen goods and not conciliating as the fact of custody. Lack of employment and other negative facts of detention and positive obstruction of the reasons for detention action is not relevant enough; It is easy to cause regional discrimination by taking foreign personnel as the facts of detention without a fixed residence. In the future reform, we should abandon the facts of practical detention and construct a standardized evaluation system of the facts of custody.
【作者单位】：江西财经大学法学院;
【基金】：江西财经大学法治江西建设协同创新中心2016年招标项目(ZD201602) 江西省社会科学研究“十三五”规划项目(16FX11)
【分类号】：D925.2
【正文快照】： 羁押作为审前剥夺公民人身自由的预防性强制措施,除符合法定羁押理由外,还必须具备事实基础,而证明羁押理由成立的事实根据就是羁押事实,比如:流窜作案作为可能再犯罪的羁押事实,赔偿被害人作为解除羁押的事实。近年来,我国审查逮捕形成了界定羁押事实,明确羁押理由,以降低

【相似文献】