保障人权视野下的录音录像制度重构

发布时间：2018-01-27 02:29

本文关键词： 录音录像制度问题对策　出处：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：犯罪嫌疑人的人权保障问题一直备受关注,如何有效减小公权力在控制犯罪的过程中给犯罪嫌疑人带来的权利侵害是刑事诉讼努力的方向。录音录像制度在我国具有惩罚犯罪和保障人权的双重功能,面对如何平衡两者的问题,侦查机关过去由于对人权保障理念的认识并不到位,更加倾向于前者。2012年《刑事诉讼法》的修订首次明文规定了“尊重和保障人权”以及录音录像制度,录音录像制度的人权保障功能也得到了越来越多的关注。然而在现阶段,录音录像的行使完全掌握在侦查机关手中,无论是作为审判方的法官还是作为辩护方的律师,均无权进行审查或提出建议。在过去“以侦查为中心”的诉讼模式下,侦羁分离制度尚无法建立,刑事拘留时间过长,审录分离并不彻底,这种种问题使得录音录像制度所能发挥的作用大大削弱。由于侦查权力过于强大以及监督措施的缺失,造成录音录像制度在侦查讯问过程中极易处于失控状态,进而引发侦查人员对犯罪嫌疑人实施诱供、逼供等行为。而受制于录音录像播放规则的限制,在审判过程中,录音录像的使用率并不高,造成了录音录像制度在实践中受到冷落。本文的创新之处是在“以审判为中心”的诉讼制度改革背景之下,以保障人权为核心,尝试重构录音录像制度,为解决现阶段存在的诸多问题提供思路。笔者建议建立中立的录音录像主管部门,充分利用先进的网络和视频监控技术,并辅以羁押场所中立、完善证据制度、缩短拘留时间等配套制度,促使录音录像制度在刑事诉讼过程中发挥更大的作用,进一步提高录音录像的中立性,防止侦查权力滥用,实现录音录像制度从保障侦查到保障诉讼,最终实现保障人权。
[Abstract]:The human rights protection of criminal suspects has been paid close attention to all the time. How to effectively reduce the public power in the process of crime control to criminal suspects brought rights infringement is the direction of criminal proceedings. Audio and video recording system in China has a dual function of punishing crime and protecting human rights. Faced with the problem of how to balance the two, the investigation organs in the past because of the concept of human rights protection is not in place. The amendment to the Code of Criminal procedure of 2012 provided for the first time that "respect for and protection of human rights" and the system of audio and video recording were expressly provided for. More and more attention has been paid to the human rights protection function of audio and video recording system. However, at this stage, the exercise of audio and video recording is entirely in the hands of investigative organs. Neither a judge as a judge nor a lawyer for the defence has the right to review or make recommendations. In the past, under the "investigation-centric" mode of litigation, the system of separation of criminal detention has not yet been established. The excessive length of criminal detention and the incomplete separation of the trial and video recording make the audio and video recording system play a significant role. Because of the power of investigation is too strong and the lack of monitoring measures. The audio and video recording system in the process of investigation and interrogation is easy to be out of control, which leads to the criminal suspects to be induced to confess, forced confessions and so on, and restricted by the rules of audio and video playback. In the course of trial, the utilization rate of audio and video recording is not high, which causes the audio and video recording system to be neglected in practice. The innovation of this paper is under the background of the lawsuit system reform of "taking trial as the center". Taking the protection of human rights as the core, this paper attempts to reconstruct the audio and video recording system to provide ideas for solving many problems existing at the present stage. The author suggests the establishment of a neutral department in charge of audio and video recording. Make full use of the advanced network and video surveillance technology, and supplemented by the neutral detention place, improve the evidence system, shorten the detention time and other supporting systems, so as to promote the audio and video recording system in the process of criminal proceedings to play a greater role. Further improve the neutrality of audio and video recording, prevent the abuse of investigative power, realize the audio and video recording system from the protection of detection to safeguard litigation, and finally realize the protection of human rights.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】