既判力视野下我国民事再审程序之重塑
发布时间:2018-01-29 22:02
本文关键词: 既判力 诉权 再审诉权 再审程序 重塑 出处:《华中师范大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:传统所研究的民事诉讼法学理论分为三大基本理论,分别是既判力理论、目的论和诉权论,而既判力理论是其中最为重要的诉讼法学理论,其支持着目的论与诉权论的深化和发展。一直以来,民事诉讼既判力理论就是各界法学工作者与研究者讨论研究的重心和焦点,同时也是司法改革工作的重点之一。既判力理论的目的是为了保证法院对案件作出裁决时的确定性。而民事再审程序成立的目的更多的是为了维护当事人的合法权益不受侵害,但这样会导致在一些情况下使得本已经决定了的案件不断的被打破,被反复的修改。这本身就与既判力理论的核心本质要求格格不入,也就是说既判力理论与民事再审程序内容存在着天然的、内在的矛盾与冲突。本论文主要就是从既判力理论与民事再审程序的基础理论,两者的功能定位、关系、现状去分析考究我国民事再审程序在现实执行过程中出现的冲突和失误,接着从既判力理论视野下分析出来的再审程序弊端入手提出一些解决方案以及构想。从而实现我们追求的司法公正、司法权威的目的。
[Abstract]:The traditional civil procedural law theory is divided into three basic theories, namely res judicata theory, Skopos theory and litigation right theory, and res judicata theory is the most important theory of procedural law. It supports the deepening and development of teleology and the theory of right of action. All along, the theory of res judicata in civil action is the focus and focus of the discussion between law workers and researchers from all walks of life. At the same time, it is also one of the emphases of the judicial reform. The purpose of res judicata theory is to ensure the certainty of the court's decision on the case. The purpose of the civil retrial procedure is to safeguard the legality of the parties. Rights and interests shall not be infringed upon. However, this will lead to some cases that have been decided to be constantly broken, repeatedly modified. This itself is incompatible with the core essence of res judicata theory requirements. That is to say, the theory of res judicata and the content of civil retrial procedure have natural, internal contradictions and conflicts. This paper is mainly from the theory of res judicata and the basic theory of civil retrial procedure, the function of both. Relationship, the current situation to analyze the civil retrial procedure in our country in the actual process of implementation of conflicts and errors. Then from the perspective of res judicata theory to analyze the defects of the retrial procedure, some solutions and ideas are put forward, so as to achieve the goal of judicial justice and judicial authority we pursue.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 李龙;论民事判决的既判力[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1999年04期
2 尹伊君;法律移植与司法制度改革[J];读书;1997年12期
3 汤维建;;我国民事再审制度的模式变迁[J];法商研究;2006年04期
4 郑晓曦;;初探民事判决既判力与再审程序的平衡[J];法制与社会;2011年11期
5 谭振波;既判力理论与我国民事诉讼法中审判监督程序的冲突及解决途径[J];河北法学;2003年01期
6 邓辉辉;;既判力视角下民事诉讼再审程序的进一步改革和完善[J];广西社会科学;2011年11期
7 李浩;民事再审程序改造论[J];法学研究;2000年05期
8 肖珍;;论既判力与民事再审程序的冲突与平衡[J];前沿;2006年10期
9 蒋集跃,杨永华;论我国民事再审制度的完善——兼谈申诉问题的理性解决[J];政法论坛;2003年02期
,本文编号:1474459
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1474459.html