内部行政行为可诉性研究

发布时间：2018-01-30 21:22

本文关键词： 内部行政行为司法审查可诉性　出处：《辽宁大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：行政行为可以被分为内部行政行为与外部行政行为，而此种界分是建立在行政行为所具体作用的对象的基础上。内部行政行为是指行政主体在内部的行政组织管理中仅针对行政组织内部做出并对其产生法律效力的行为。对内部行政行为的可诉性研究源于行政诉讼法的相关规定。其中，我国现行《行政诉讼法》第12条第3款规定：行政机关对行政机关工作人员的奖惩、任免等决定，不属于人民法院行政诉讼受案范围。内部行政行为可诉性内涵解析与国外立法现状。可诉性的内涵解析，主要从内部行政行为的概念、内部行政行为与外部行政行为的界分以及可诉性的内涵三个方面来解析，以便准确把握内部行政行为可诉性的内涵。此外我国内部行政行为可诉性的立法现状中列举我国目前关于内部行政行为的所有的救济方式。最后比较了英美法系和大陆法系关于内部行政行为可诉性研究的现状，得出内部行政行为在国外已部分可诉，，我们可以借鉴。必要性和可行性是内部行政行为可诉性研究中的两个重要方面，因而此部分主要着重从这两方面来陈述。其中，内部行政行为可诉的必要性源于理论上的影响，实践中侵权行为的存在和内部救济不顺畅。另外司法权、行政权和人权观念都直接影响了内部行政行为是否具有诉讼的必要性。而内部行政行为可诉的可行性主要论述了其理论支撑和实践基础。研究内部行政行为可诉性的核心问题是明确内部行政行为可诉性范围。之所以具有核心意义，是因为行政诉讼的目的是将行政机关的行政行为纳入司法审查，最终能够保护内部行政相对人的合法权益，而内部行政行为内容的复杂性与广泛性决定了我们不可能将可诉的内部行政行为一一列举，因而研究内部行政行为可诉的标准也就具有重要的意义，而此种可诉性的标准可以概括为宏观标准和微观标准，宏观标准中的司法权有干涉行政权的必要性适用于立法过程中。微观标准涵盖了内部行政行为的做出违反相关法律规定、内部行政行为侵犯了相对人合法的人身权和财产权、内部行政行为是一种完成性的行政行为以及相对人已穷尽行政内部救济，其主要适用于具体的司法实践中。另外在确立的标准下再辅以几种特殊的可诉内部行政行为研究能够使得内部行政行为可诉性的研究更加全面。
[Abstract]:Administrative acts can be divided into internal administrative acts and external administrative acts. This kind of demarcation is based on the object of the specific function of the administrative act. The internal administrative act refers to the administrative subject who only makes the administrative act within the administrative organization and produces the legal effect on it in the management of the internal administrative organization. Behavior. The research on the justiciability of the internal administrative act originates from the relevant provisions of the Administrative procedure Law. Article 12, paragraph 3, of the present Administrative procedure Law of our country stipulates that the decision of the administrative organ to reward and punish the staff of the administrative organ, to appoint or remove the staff, and so on, does not fall within the scope of the administrative litigation case of the people's court. The connotation analysis of internal administrative act actionable and the present situation of foreign legislation. The connotation analysis of justiciability mainly from the concept of internal administrative act. This paper analyzes the boundary between internal administrative act and external administrative act and the connotation of actionable. In order to accurately grasp the connotation of the justiciability of the internal administrative act. In addition, in the present legislative situation of the actionable nature of the internal administrative act in our country, all the remedies concerning the internal administrative act in our country are listed. Finally, the common law system is compared. And the current situation of the research on the justiciability of internal administrative acts in the civil law system. Draw the conclusion that the internal administrative acts in foreign countries have been partially actionable, we can use for reference. Necessity and feasibility are two important aspects in the study of the justiciability of internal administrative action, so this part mainly focuses on these two aspects. The necessity of internal administrative action can be sued from the influence of theory, the existence of tort and internal remedy are not smooth in practice. In addition, judicial power. The concept of administrative power and human rights has a direct impact on the necessity of litigation in internal administrative action, while the feasibility of actionable internal administrative act mainly discusses its theoretical support and practical basis. The core problem of the study on the justiciability of internal administrative acts is to clarify the scope of the justiciability of internal administrative acts. The reason is that the purpose of administrative litigation is to bring the administrative acts of administrative organs into judicial review. Ultimately can protect the legitimate rights and interests of the internal administrative counterpart, and the complexity and universality of the content of the internal administrative act determines that we can not list one by one the internal administrative acts that can be sued. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the standards of internal administrative action, which can be summarized as macro and micro standards. The necessity of the judicial power to interfere with the executive power in the macro standard is applicable to the legislative process. The micro standard covers the violation of the relevant legal provisions by the making of the internal administrative act. The internal administrative act has violated the relative person's legal personal right and the property right, the internal administrative behavior is a kind of complete administrative act and the relative party has exhausted the administrative internal relief. It is mainly applicable to the specific judicial practice. In addition, under the established standards and supplemented by several special research on the internal administrative act of actionable can make the research of the internal administrative act actionable more comprehensive.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】