反信息公开诉讼研究

发布时间：2018-01-31 18:06

本文关键词： 预防性诉讼行政诉讼个人隐私反信息公开诉讼　出处：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：行政机关建立信息公开的制度，在一定的程度上实现了行政相对人对于信息的知悉的权利。但是对于所要进行公示的内容在包含有第三人的隐私权或者商业秘密的情况下，，如何维护自己的合法权益不受侵犯？此时行政机关公开信息则会损害到第三人的隐私权和商业秘密。从目前的实践经验来看，信息公开案件中的第三人常常提起反信息公开诉讼的方式来维护自己的权益。从成文法上，现在的法律对于反信息公开诉讼的规定并不完善。关于反信息公开诉讼的规则也都停留在初始的状态。从国外的诉讼制度发展历史来看，各国的诉讼制度的发展轨迹是从开始的重视事后救济的诉讼制度发展到反信息公开等的事前预防性诉讼制度。反信息公开诉讼作为预防性诉讼制度的典型代表与以往的普通行政诉讼具有很大的不同之处，其具有很大的优越性。信息公开是在保障公民知情权的层面出发，而反信息公开诉讼是在保障公民隐私权和商业秘密的角度思考。信息公开和反信息公开是一个问题的两面，不可偏废其一。我国的《信息公开条例》和《行政诉讼法》为反信息公开诉讼提供了制度基础，但是对于反信息公开的起诉规则和审判规则并不清晰，许多问题都只是原则性的规定并没有有效的可操作的措施。因此这些问题的分析对于反信息公开诉讼的顺利进行和相关人的权利保护都具有十分重要的意义。本文除引言一共有四部分：第一部分，反信息公开诉讼的基础理论问题。首先，从反信息公开诉讼的概念入手分析反信息公开诉讼的预防性和暂时停止执行性等特征。其次，分析反信息公开诉讼存在的法理基础，反信息公开诉讼是保护公民“隐私权”和商业秘密的需要，同时也是行政相对人和行政相关人权益平衡的要求。最后，分析我国建立反信息公开诉讼制度的目的和意义：保护“个人隐私”和商业秘密，有助于对我国保护公民权益的方式进一步的进行完善，并且在现有制度的基础上使我国的行政诉讼制度更进一步。第二部分，主要叙述当代反信息公开诉讼制度的发展现状，从我国的现在的立法制度讲起，分析我国在反信息公开制度的现状和不足，并对国外的反信息公开诉讼制度的内容进行解析。第三部分，在上述分析的基础之上，讨论我国的反信息公开诉讼制度在起诉规则的有关问题，分析起诉规则中的法律依据和诉讼当事人问题。第四部分，本部分针对反信息公开之诉的审理规则进行分析。在法庭审理中分为法律审和事实审还有程序性方面的审查。接着分析反信息公开诉讼的判决种类，如禁制令判决、给付判决、撤销判决、赔偿判决。总之，通过建立反信息公开诉讼制度的方式来保护信息公开过程中行政相关人的合法权益，保护“个人的隐私”和商业秘密不受侵犯。
[Abstract]:Administrative organs establish a system of information disclosure. To a certain extent, the administrative counterpart has realized the right to know the information. But the content to be published includes the privacy of the third party or the case of trade secrets. How to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests are not infringed? At this time, the public information of administrative organs will damage the privacy and trade secrets of the third party. In the case of information disclosure, the third party often brings a suit against the disclosure of information in order to protect his own rights and interests. The current law for the anti-information disclosure litigation provisions are not perfect. The rules on anti-information disclosure litigation are also staying in the initial state. From the history of the development of foreign litigation system. The development track of litigation system in various countries is from the beginning of the litigation system which attaches importance to the relief after the event to the system of preventive action in advance, such as counter-disclosure of information, etc. As a typical representative of the system of preventive action, the action against disclosure of information is the representative of the system of preventive litigation. The common administrative litigation in the past has great differences. Information disclosure is based on the protection of citizens' right to know. The anti-information disclosure litigation is to protect the privacy of citizens and the perspective of trade secrets. Information disclosure and anti-information disclosure are two sides of the same problem. In our country, the regulations on Information publicity and the Administrative procedure Law provide the system basis for the anti-information publicity litigation, but the rules of prosecution and the trial rules for the anti-information disclosure are not clear. Many problems are just rules of principle and there are no effective operational measures. Therefore, the analysis of these problems is of great significance to the smooth progress of the anti-information public litigation and the protection of the rights of related persons. In addition to the introduction, there are four parts in this paper: The first part, the basic theoretical issues of anti-information disclosure litigation. First, from the concept of anti-information disclosure litigation analysis of anti-information disclosure litigation preventive and temporary suspension of the characteristics. Secondly. Analysis of the legal basis of anti-information disclosure litigation, anti-information disclosure litigation is the protection of citizens'"privacy" and business secrets, but also the requirements of the balance of the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart and administrative related persons. Finally. This paper analyzes the purpose and significance of establishing the anti-information publicity litigation system in China: the protection of "personal privacy" and trade secrets is helpful to the further improvement of the way of protecting the rights and interests of citizens in our country. And on the basis of the existing system, our administrative litigation system further. The second part mainly describes the current situation of the development of the contemporary anti-information disclosure litigation system, from the current legislative system of our country, analyzes the current situation and deficiencies of the anti-information disclosure system in our country. And the content of the foreign anti-information publicity litigation system is analyzed. The third part, on the basis of the above analysis, discusses the problems related to the prosecution rules of the anti-information publicity litigation system in China, and analyzes the legal basis and litigant issues in the prosecution rules. Part 4th. In this part, the author analyzes the hearing rules of anti-information disclosure suit. It is divided into legal trial and factual trial and procedural review in the court trial. Then, it analyzes the types of judgment in the anti-information public litigation. Such as injunction judgment, payment judgment, annulment judgment, compensation judgment. In a word, we can protect the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative related persons in the process of information disclosure by establishing a lawsuit system against the disclosure of information, and protect "personal privacy" and trade secrets from being infringed.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】