论证据客观性保障规则

发布时间：2018-02-04 04:44

本文关键词： 证据客观性保障规则客观性保障条件证据排除　出处：《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》中,针对各类证据设置了若干证据客观性保障规则,也即排除不具备证据客观性保障条件的证据的规则。我国的证据客观性保障规则与美国的鉴真制度在规则特征、制度特征、规范目的等方面均有区别。这些规则的出现,为重新审视我国证据法学界关于证据的"三性"理论提供了一种新契机,同时扩展了证据排除规则的范围。我国的证据客观性保障规则具有以法官审查判断证据为中心、规则的形式化特征较强、对言词证据的取证设置了较严的客观性保障条件等特点。为使证据客观性保障规则在实践中充分发挥作用,应对规则的实施进行诉讼化改革,完善证明机制,同时加强规则自身的科学性及灵活性。
[Abstract]:In the provisions on examining and judging evidence in death penalty cases, a number of rules for safeguarding the objectivity of evidence have been set up for all types of evidence. That is to say, the rule of excluding the evidence which does not have the guarantee condition of the objectivity of evidence. The rule of the objective of evidence in our country and the system of the United States of America are characteristic of the rule and the characteristic of the system. The appearance of these rules provides a new opportunity to re-examine the theory of "three properties" of evidence in the field of evidence law in China. At the same time, it expands the scope of the rule of evidence exclusion. The rules of the objectivity of evidence in our country are centered on the evidence of judges' examination and judgment, and the rules have strong formalized characteristics. In order to give full play to the rule of objective evidence in practice, we should reform the implementation of the rules and perfect the mechanism of proof. At the same time, strengthen the scientific nature and flexibility of the rules themselves.
【作者单位】：四川大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2
【正文快照】： 一、证据客观性保障规则的概念界定(一)对司法解释中若干特殊证据规则的性质判断在2010年6月两院三部颁布的《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》(以下简称《死刑规定》)中,确立了一些各类证据不得作为定案根据的规则,如第8条针对物证和书证的照片、复制品、复制件

【参考文献】