司法公开制度实践及其完善——基于南京“彭宇案”而展开的研究

发布时间：2018-02-04 12:10

本文关键词： 彭宇案法院司法公开制度交互性司法公开模式信息发布机制舆论回应机制　出处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：法院司法公开制度建设所取得的成绩令人鼓舞,但在实践中仍然有值得深入研究的问题,其中突出的是司法公开制度建设上仍然存在的封闭性、单向性等现象,使得在现实司法实践过程中,所谓司法公开制度却不能有效构建起对外部信息或舆论的回应,这直接影响了民众对司法公信力的期盼。运用法律社会学方法,以具有典型意义的彭宇案为切入点进行分析研究,展现了彭宇案中当事人、媒体和公众以及法院的行动特征。法院判决没有错误,但在媒体的持续发酵中却不作回应,这与法院司法公开制度不完善密切相关。应建立法院与媒体合理对话的司法公开机制,加强司法公开机制的法治保障,构建包含信息发布机制和舆论回应机制等内容的交互性模式的制度系统,以完善法院司法公开制度。
[Abstract]:The achievements in the construction of the judicial disclosure system of the court are encouraging, but in practice there are still problems worthy of further study, among which, there are still closed and unidirectional phenomena in the construction of the judicial disclosure system. In the process of judicial practice, the so-called judicial disclosure system can not effectively construct the response to the external information or public opinion, which directly affects the public's expectation of judicial credibility. With the typical meaning of Peng Yu case as the breakthrough point of analysis and research, it shows the action characteristics of the parties, the media and the public, as well as the court. The court judgment is not wrong. However, there is no response in the continuous fermentation of the media, which is closely related to the imperfection of the judicial disclosure system of the court. We should establish the judicial openness mechanism of reasonable dialogue between the court and the media, and strengthen the rule of law protection of the judicial disclosure mechanism. In order to perfect the system of judicial openness of the court, an interactive system including the mechanism of information release and the mechanism of public opinion response is constructed.
【作者单位】：华东理工大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会(部级)2013年重大研究项目“法律实施的保障机制研究”(CLS2013A04) 2016年中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“法律制度实施效果评估体系研究”(WT1621001)
【分类号】：D926.1
【正文快照】： 一、彭宇案与司法公开制度建设法院司法公开制度建设所取得的成绩令人鼓舞,但在实践中仍然有值得深入研究的问题。就学术界、实务界而言,在法院司法公开制度研究上,关注较多的如司法公开的价值、意义和功能的问题,中国司法公开制度的历史演进问题,域外司法公开制度建设的借鉴

【参考文献】