美国非法证据排除规则威慑功能的弱化——兼评赫尔英案对“善意例外”的扩张

发布时间：2018-02-09 22:28

本文关键词： 非法证据排除规则善意例外赫尔英案威慑警察违法行为　出处：《河北法学》2013年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：美国2009年的赫尔英案创设了非法证据排除规则"善意例外"的新类型,即因客观上合理信赖其他警察部门记录而取得的非法证据不予以排除。赫尔英案对"善意例外"的扩张反映出非法证据排除规则威慑功能的弱化。回顾美国非法证据排除规则的发展历程,它的例外不断创设、威慑功能逐渐式微是贯穿其间的主线。反思非法证据排除规则,它在威慑警察违法方面具有内在局限性,本质是让全社会为警察的行为承担责任,惩戒警察个人才是防止违法取证的最有效途径。我国的非法物证排除规则以法官裁量排除为原则,以减少冤假错案为目的,有效遏制警察违法行为依然需要强化警察惩戒机制。
[Abstract]:In 2009, the Helying case in the United States created a new type of "good faith exception" of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence. That is, the illegal evidence obtained by objectively and reasonably relying on the records of other police departments is not excluded. The expansion of the "good will exception" in the Helying case reflects the weakening of the deterrent function of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence. The development of evidence exclusion rules, Its exception is constantly created and its deterrent function is gradually declining is the main line running through it. Reflecting on the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence, it has inherent limitations in deterring the police from breaking the law, and the essence is to make the whole society bear responsibility for the police's behavior. The most effective way to prevent illegal collection of evidence is to discipline police officers. In our country, the rule of illegal material evidence exclusion is based on the principle of judge's discretion exclusion, with the aim of reducing cases of injustice and falsehood, it is still necessary to strengthen the police disciplinary mechanism in order to effectively curb the illegal behavior of police officers.
【作者单位】：广东医学院人文与管理学院;
【分类号】：D971.2;D925.2

【参考文献】