知识产权诉讼科学证据规则研究

发布时间：2018-02-27 16:20

本文关键词： 知识产权诉讼科学证据证据规则事实认定　出处：《华侨大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：就诉讼实践来说,尤其是与知识产权相关的诉讼,因高科技的介入以及科学证据的应用,使传统性质的事实认定策略正在转换,即由以往把认证看成是证明的核心依据转换成把物证或者科学证据看成是证明的核心依据。达马斯在谈及未来证据走向时曾论述了基于事实来实现判定的科学化这一问题。何家弘也曾论述科学证据将会引领未来时代。这说明证据制度将会趋于完善,错案会被降至最低,司法将会达至最高程度的公正。然而,科学证据在带来真相的同时,随之也带来许多困惑和挑战。主要体现在面对错综复杂的知识产权侵权诉讼科学证据时,对科学证据的收集保全、质证和审查认定上。为了解决科学证据带来的问题,本文将探讨如何科学地构建和完善知识产权诉讼科学证据规则体系,希冀能依据科学证据规制,对科学依据进行合理的认定,最终能使裁决达到公正。就本文看,若不含引言和结语,可分4部分。第一部分:对知识产权诉讼以及和科学性质的证据规则等进行概述。界定了和知识产权相关的诉讼内涵、种类以及其他专门问题。对科学证据的概念进行了介绍,并与专家证言和鉴定意见做了辨析,指出知识产权科学证据的特殊性,以便更好地界定科学证据规则。第二部分:对和知识产权相关的诉讼以及和科学性质的证据规则等进行展开。首先分析何种成分是构成和知识产权有关的科学证据的因子,再根据证据运用的过程结合科学证据的隐蔽性强和涉及专门知识的特性将科学证据规则结构分为科学证据收集规则、质证规则和认证规则三部分,并分别对其区别于一般证据规则的特殊规则进行概述。因此,就本文来说,收集科学性质的证据规则并针对其陷阱类型的取证规则、披露类型的取证规则以及保全类型的取证规则给予分析。就科学证据来说,其质证规则是研究科学证据相关的专家对其辅助对象人质证这一规则进行分析;其认证规则是对认证中的基本规则以及其中的优势证据规则加以分析。第三部分:对国内与知识产权相关的诉讼中的科学性质的证据规则是否使用的问题进行分析。且着眼于科学证据中的收集类型的规则、质证类型的规则和认证类型的规则,分析这些规则中各自的问题。第四部分:完善国内和知识产权相关的诉讼中的科学证据所需的规则。为了解决知识产权科学证据规则在适用中遇到的问题,文本试着提出对科学证据收集规则和质证规则的完善建议,并借鉴美国的多伯特规则,对现有的知识产权诉讼科学证据认证规则进行了深入构建和完善。
[Abstract]:As far as litigation practice is concerned, especially those related to intellectual property rights, because of the intervention of high technology and the application of scientific evidence, the traditional fact finding strategy is changing. That is to say, authentication is regarded as the core basis of proof in the past, and physical evidence or scientific evidence is regarded as the core basis of proof. When Damase talked about the future trend of evidence, he discussed the realization of scientific judgment based on facts. He Jiahong also stated that scientific evidence will lead the future. This shows that the system of evidence will be improved. Misdemeanours will be minimized and justice will be maximized. However, scientific evidence brings the truth at the same time, It also brings many puzzles and challenges. It is mainly reflected in the collection, preservation, cross-examination and confirmation of scientific evidence in the face of the complicated scientific evidence of intellectual property infringement litigation. In order to solve the problems brought about by scientific evidence, This paper will discuss how to scientifically construct and perfect the system of scientific evidence rules in intellectual property litigation, hoping that the scientific basis can be reasonably recognized according to the scientific evidence rules, and finally the ruling can reach justice. If the introduction and conclusion are not included, they can be divided into four parts. The first part: an overview of intellectual property litigation and the rules of evidence of scientific nature, etc., which define the connotation of litigation related to intellectual property, Introducing the concept of scientific evidence, discriminating with expert testimony and expert opinion, pointing out the particularity of intellectual property scientific evidence, In order to better define the rules of scientific evidence. Part two: proceeding with proceedings relating to intellectual property and rules of evidence of a scientific nature. According to the process of evidence application and the characteristics of scientific evidence, the structure of scientific evidence rule is divided into three parts: scientific evidence collection rule, cross-examination rule and authentication rule. The special rules which are different from the general rules of evidence are summarized respectively. Therefore, for the purpose of this paper, the rules of collecting evidence of scientific nature and the rules of obtaining evidence for the types of traps are collected. As far as scientific evidence is concerned, the rules of cross-examination of disclosure type and preservation type are to analyze the rules of human cross-examination, which are related to scientific evidence. The rules of authentication are to analyze the basic rules of authentication and the rules of evidence of superiority. Part three: whether or not to use the rules of evidence of scientific nature in domestic intellectual property litigation. Analysis. And focusing on the rules of type of collection in scientific evidence, Rules for cross-examination types and authentication types, Analysis of the respective problems in these rules. Part 4th: rules required to improve scientific evidence in domestic and intellectual property litigation. In order to solve the problems encountered in the application of the rules on scientific evidence in intellectual property rights, The text tries to put forward some suggestions to perfect the rules of scientific evidence collection and cross-examination, and draws lessons from the Dobert rule of the United States to construct and perfect the existing rules of scientific evidence certification in intellectual property litigation.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.4;D925.13

【相似文献】