查处渎职侵权犯罪案件的难点与对策
发布时间:2018-02-27 20:27
本文关键词: 检察机关 渎职侵权案件 查处难点 侦查一体化 出处:《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:渎职侵权犯罪不仅使公共财产、国家和人民利益遭受重大损失,而且严重损害党和政府的形象及威信,对我国的经济转型、产业发展、良好市场环境的建立等方面造成不可估量的负面影响,与新形势下党和国家大局的要求相背离。随着社会经济的不断发展,近年来,我国渎职侵权犯罪呈上升的趋势,直接损害着人民和国家的基本权利,使国家的各种政策难以推进落实、人民群众对国家司法、执法的公信力降低。因此,只有严厉打击渎职侵权犯罪才能还政治以清明、人民以公道。但是由于渎职侵权犯罪案件涉及面广、案情复杂、案件事实又比较模糊性、作案主体特殊、作案手段隐蔽,再加上社会大众对渎职侵权行为认识不深,使得此类案件的查处出现“发现难、查证难、处理难”等问题。本文将针对反渎职侵权检察实务中存在的一些问题进行归纳和阐述,从渎职侵权犯罪的立法、查处渎职侵权犯罪案件的相关机制等方面深入分析,找出存在这些问题的原因,并提出相应的对策,本文主要通过以下三个部分来进行论述:本文的第一部分是对渎职侵权犯罪案件的概念、范围和基本特征进行必要性的论述。首先是通过介绍国内外关于渎职侵权的立法状况及学术界对渎职侵权犯罪的认识,得出此类犯罪的基本概念和所包含的范围,进而对这些犯罪的特点进行总结分析,为发现渎职侵权犯罪案件侦查过程中出现的问题和矛盾,并找出解决这些难题的良好对策奠定基础。第二部分是对我国检察机关查处渎职侵权犯罪案件的情况作简要介绍,通过对近年来所查办案件的数量、比例和判决情况等相关数据进行对比,总结出我国检察机关在查处渎职侵权犯罪案件中所面临的案件线索发现难、查证难、案件处理难等问题,并分别深入分析造成这些问题的原因,为解决侦查过程中出现的问题指明方向。结合办案实践,分析出现以上困境主要是由渎职侵权犯罪立法上的不完备、相关制度的不完善、犯罪主体反侦查能力强、对证人的取证难度大、反渎职侵权工作社会认知度低、相关机制不完善等原因造成的。第三部分是建议侦查机关在以后的渎检工作中要加大渎职侵权犯罪案件的宣传力度、加强与其他部门之间的协调合作,在侦查过程中大胆运用侦查谋略、加快科技强检的步伐,在立法上,要提高量刑、增加量刑档次、增设资格刑、增设罚金刑、限制免刑和缓刑的适用,完善惩处和预防渎职侵权犯罪的法律法规。在侦查机制上要建立健全案件线索收集机制、建立垂直领导机制、加强反渎职侵权队伍建设、完善侦查一体化制度、注重各部门之间合作沟通和监督协调的机制,充分发挥侦查一体化功能。
[Abstract]:The crime of malfeasance and tort not only causes great losses to public property, the interests of the state and the people, but also seriously damages the image and prestige of the Party and the government, and is conducive to the economic transformation and industrial development of our country. The establishment of a good market environment has caused incalculable negative effects and deviated from the requirements of the overall situation of the Party and the country under the new situation. With the continuous development of social economy, the crime of malfeasance and tort in our country has been on the rise in recent years. It directly damages the basic rights of the people and the state, makes it difficult to carry out various policies of the state, and reduces the credibility of the people in the administration of justice and law enforcement by the state. Therefore, only by severely cracking down on the crime of malfeasance and infringement can we return to politics with Pure Brightness. The people are just. However, because the cases of malfeasance and infringement crimes involve a wide range of areas, the cases are complex, the facts of the cases are relatively vague, the main body of the crime is special, the means of committing the crime are hidden, and the public has no deep understanding of the malfeasance and infringement, This article will sum up and expound some problems existing in the practice of anti-malfeasance tort procuratorial, from the legislation of malfeasance tort crime, To find out the causes of these problems, and to put forward corresponding countermeasures through in-depth analysis of the relevant mechanisms for investigating and dealing with cases of malfeasance and tort. This paper mainly through the following three parts to discuss: the first part of this article is the concept of malfeasance tort cases, First of all, by introducing the legislative situation of malfeasance infringement at home and abroad and the understanding of the crime of dereliction of duty in academic circles, the basic concept and scope of this kind of crime are obtained. Then the characteristics of these crimes are summarized and analyzed, in order to find the problems and contradictions in the investigation of malfeasance and tort cases, And find out the good countermeasures to solve these problems to lay a foundation. The second part is a brief introduction to the investigation and handling of cases of malfeasance and infringement by the procuratorial organs in China, through the number of cases investigated and handled in recent years. By comparing the relevant data, such as the proportion and the judgment, we can conclude that the procuratorial organs in our country are facing difficulties in finding, verifying and handling cases in the investigation and handling of cases of malfeasance and tort crimes. And respectively in-depth analysis of the causes of these problems, in order to solve the problems in the investigation process to point out the direction. Combined with the practice of handling cases, the above difficulties are mainly due to the malfeasance infringement crime legislation is not complete, the relevant system is not perfect, The crime subject has strong ability of counter-investigation, is difficult to obtain evidence from witnesses, and has low social recognition of anti-malfeasance and infringement work. The third part is to suggest that the investigation organs should increase the publicity of malfeasance and tort cases and strengthen coordination and cooperation with other departments in the future blasphemy work. In the course of investigation, we should make bold use of investigative strategies to speed up the pace of scientific and technological inspection. In legislation, we should increase sentencing, increase the level of sentencing, increase qualification penalties, increase fines, and limit the application of waivers and suspended sentences. To perfect the laws and regulations for punishing and preventing malfeasance and tort crimes. In the investigation mechanism, it is necessary to establish and improve the collection mechanism of case clues, establish a vertical leadership mechanism, strengthen the construction of anti-malfeasance tort teams, and improve the system of integration of investigation. Pay attention to the mechanism of cooperation, communication, supervision and coordination between various departments, and give full play to the function of investigation integration.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2;D926.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 沈嘉青;;浅谈渎职犯罪案件线索经营管理[J];现代商业;2012年34期
2 刘玉峰;朱景汉;;我国渎职侵权犯罪立法完善若干问题探讨[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2012年02期
3 上官春光;;职务犯罪侦查专业化的表现及途径[J];法学评论;2009年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 王国臣;;当前反渎职侵权犯罪工作的思考[N];黑龙江经济报;2010年
2 ;如何规范渎职侵权案件侦查一体化[N];检察日报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 李小兵;论渎职侵权犯罪案件侦查的完善[D];湖南大学;2011年
2 曹元义;渎职侵权案件侦查对策研究[D];黑龙江大学;2006年
,本文编号:1544191
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1544191.html