电子数据类型化及其真实性判断

发布时间：2018-02-28 23:12

本文关键词： 电子数据证据真实性类型化原件　出处：《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：最新修订的《民事诉讼法》和《刑事诉讼法》都已将电子数据纳入到法定的证据形式之中,接下来应尽快制定具体的、具有可操作性的电子数据审查规则。然而,目前我国实务界和理论界对电子数据真实性的认识尚存在以偏概全等误区,要想正确判断电子数据的真实性,必须首先对其作类型化的研究,并在此基础上提出电子数据真实性的判断标准。有别于以往对电子证据的分类,文章以司法应用为目的,根据不同的提供主体,将电子数据分为孤立数据和系统数据,前者包括可编辑数据、只读数据与不可读数据,后者包括二维数据和多维数据。不同类型的电子数据存在不同的真实性判断标准和方法。
[Abstract]:Both the newly revised Code of Civil procedure and the Code of Criminal procedure have incorporated electronic data into the statutory forms of evidence, and specific and operational electronic data review rules should be formulated as soon as possible. At present, there are still some misunderstandings about the authenticity of electronic data in the field of practice and theory of our country. In order to judge the authenticity of electronic data correctly, we must first study the authenticity of electronic data by type. Different from the classification of electronic evidence in the past, the paper divides the electronic data into isolated data and system data according to the different providers. The former includes editable data, read-only data and unreadable data, while the latter includes two-dimensional data and multidimensional data.
【作者单位】：湘潭大学法学院;
【基金】：湖南省高校创新平台开放基金项目“我国民事诉讼法制现代化研究”(09K029)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925

【参考文献】