论我国电讯监听措施法律监督制度的重构

发布时间：2018-03-01 21:03

本文关键词： 技术侦查电讯监听犯罪控制人权保障法律监督　出处：《河北法学》2013年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：2012年3月14日通过的刑诉法修正案将技术侦查措施决定权和执行权明确赋予了公安机关,这使得公安机关在刑事诉讼侦查阶段已经空前强大的侦查权得到又一次增强。在我国处于社会转型阶段的特殊时期,刑事案件尤其是具有重大社会影响的恶性刑事案件总体上呈现出多发、高发的严峻态势,社会大众对公共安全的心理承受底线不断受到冲击。因此,允许公安机关运用以电讯监听等为代表的技术侦查措施,对于迅速有效破获刑事案件,积极打击严重刑事犯罪,切实维护公共安全尤为必要。与此同时,出于保护公民基本权利和维护犯罪嫌疑人、被告人诉讼权利的考量,也应该加强对公安机关适用电讯监听等技术侦查措施的法律监督,进而平衡国家权力与公民权利的激烈冲突,兼顾犯罪控制与人权保障的双重目的,实现实体公正与程序正义并重的价值取向。
[Abstract]:The amendment to the Criminal procedure Law passed in March 14th 2012 gave the public security organ the right to decide and execute the technical investigation measures. This makes the investigation power of public security organs, which has never been stronger than ever before, in the criminal investigation stage. In the special period of social transformation in our country, Criminal cases, especially malignant criminal cases with significant social impact, generally present a severe situation of multiple and high incidence, and the psychological bottom line of public safety is constantly being attacked by the public. Therefore, Allowing public security organs to use technical investigation measures, such as telecommunications monitoring, is particularly necessary for the speedy and effective detection of criminal cases, for actively cracking down on serious criminal crimes, and for earnestly safeguarding public safety. In order to protect the basic rights of citizens and safeguard the rights of criminal suspects and defendants, we should also strengthen the legal supervision over the application of technical investigative measures such as telecommunications monitoring by public security organs. Furthermore, it balances the fierce conflict between state power and civil rights, takes into account the dual purposes of crime control and human rights protection, and realizes the value orientation of paying equal attention to substantive justice and procedural justice.
【作者单位】：中共成都市纪律检查委员会;西南财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】