当前检察环节律师权利的保障现状与新现问题研究——以阅卷权、会见权和检察救济权切入

发布时间：2018-03-02 05:04

本文关键词： 检察环节辩护律师阅卷权会见权检察救济权　出处：《河北法学》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：当下检察环节辩护律师阅卷权的保障总体良好,但对于讯问录音录像材料能否纳入阅卷范围;犯罪嫌疑人是否有阅卷权仍存争议。对此,有必要从讯问录音录像的功能定位、证据属性,以及犯罪嫌疑人阅卷权的法理导源入手,正本清源。在职务犯罪侦查中,律师会见权的保障仍有待提高。对于特别重大贿赂犯罪的认定标准应进一步细化,并设计不批准会见上提一级的检察审查或备案机制;同时限制指定居所监视居住的滥用,避免由此引发的律师会见权的变相剥夺。另外,对于辩护律师的检察救济权应当完善机制,赋予辩护律师对控告申诉的检察处理结果不服有向更高一级检察机关复议的权利。
[Abstract]:At present, the defense lawyer's marking right in the procuratorial link is generally good, but whether the audiovisual material can be included in the scope of the examination paper and whether the suspect has the right to read the paper is still controversial. In view of this, it is necessary to locate the function of the audiovisual recording of the interrogation. The evidence attribute, as well as the legal theory guide source of the criminal suspect's marking right, should clear the root. In the investigation of the duty crime, the guarantee of the lawyer's meeting right still needs to be improved. The identification standard of the especially important bribery crime should be further refined. At the same time, to limit the abuse of designated residence to monitor residence, to avoid the resulting disguised deprivation of lawyers' right to meet. In addition, The procuratorial relief right of defense lawyer should be perfected and the defense lawyer should be given the right to reconsider to a higher procuratorial organ if he is not satisfied with the result of procuratorial treatment of complaint.
【作者单位】：最高人民检察院检察理论研究所;北京京平律师事务所;
【基金】：2014年国家社科基金青年项目《检察环节刑事错案成因与对策的实证研究》(14CFX023)的阶段性研究成果最高人民检察院检察理论研究所重大课题《律师辩护机制完善与检察错案防范》(JL2016A12)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D926.3;D926.5

【相似文献】