行政裁量的司法介入边际

发布时间：2018-03-03 03:21

本文选题：行政裁量　切入点：介入边际　出处：《青岛大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：中国于2014年进行修订的《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》相较于1989年版《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》,为司法进入行政裁量领域提供了更为丰富的法律支持,这使司法介入对行政裁量的影响进一步扩大。本文对比英美法系与大陆法系关于行政裁量的司法介入理论及实践,对中国行政裁量的司法介入做出实证性分析,明晰中国行政裁量的司法介入边际。对行政裁量的司法介入边际出现的现实问题进行分类研究,以厘清司法对行政裁量的介入的范围和程度的边际,确立不同的审查机制和措施机制。行政权需要司法权的制约,司法权在制约行政权时又要为行政权的自身判断留有足够的空间。为了实现这种状态,使司法权与行政权保持制约与平衡,对于行政裁量的司法介入边际的明晰有着迫切的需求。本文首先从概念入手,通过对行政裁量的司法介入的限度及程度进行分析,从而指出进行该研究的必要性。《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》于2014年进行了修订,对行政诉讼的受案范围进行了扩大,而其最重要的变化则为增加了第三条的内容使得公民提起行政诉讼的权利得到了进一步的保证。然后则从英美法系与大陆法系行政裁量的司法介入边际状况进行一系列的理论分析。早在中国行政机关和司法机关还是一家的时候,英美法系和大陆法系就已经有了行政裁量的司法审查制度,所以对于他们的行政审查制度的研究能够给予中国对于相关制度的研究提供很好的借鉴。下一部分则是对中国目前行政裁量的司法介入边际存在的问题进行了一系列的分析,希望能够通过找出现有的问题来更好的确立适合于中国现状的行政裁量的司法介入边际。最后则是对中国现在存在的问题的解决方案,以及建立合适的行政裁量的司法介入边际。
[Abstract]:Compared with the 1989 edition of the Administrative procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, the Administrative Litigation Law of the people's Republic of China, which was amended on 2014, has provided more abundant legal support for the judicial entry into the field of administrative discretion. This makes the influence of judicial intervention on administrative discretion further expanded. This paper compares the theory and practice of judicial intervention of administrative discretion between Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and makes an empirical analysis on the judicial intervention of administrative discretion in China. To clarify the judicial intervention margin of administrative discretion in China. To classify the practical problems of judicial intervention margin of administrative discretion in order to clarify the range and extent of judicial intervention to administrative discretion. Establish different review mechanism and measure mechanism. The executive power needs the restriction of the judicial power, while restricting the executive power, the judicial power should leave enough space for the judgment of the executive power itself. In order to realize this kind of state, In order to keep the restriction and balance between the judicial power and the administrative power, there is an urgent need for the clarity of the judicial intervention margin of the administrative discretion. Firstly, this paper begins with the concept and analyzes the limits and the degree of the judicial intervention of the administrative discretion. In 2014, the Administrative procedure Law of the people's Republic of China was amended to expand the scope of cases accepted in administrative proceedings. The most important change is that the content of Article 3 has been added to ensure the citizens' right to file administrative proceedings. Then, it is carried out from the judicial intervention margin of administrative discretion in Anglo-American law system and civil law system. A series of theoretical analyses. As early as when China's administrative and judicial organs were still one, The common law system and the civil law system already have a judicial review system of administrative discretion. Therefore, the study of their administrative review system can provide a good reference for the study of relevant systems in China. The next part is a series of analysis of the problems existing in the judicial intervention margin of the current administrative discretion in China. I hope to be able to better establish the judicial intervention margin of administrative discretion suitable for the current situation in China by finding some problems. Finally, it is the solution to the existing problems in China. And the establishment of appropriate administrative discretion of judicial intervention margin.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】