论刑事诉讼中过程证据适用的完善

发布时间：2018-03-04 18:39

本文选题：刑事诉讼　切入点：过程证据　出处：《扬州大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：过程证据是证明案件过程事实的材料,实质上是一种司法过程的行为记录,贯穿侦查、强制措施、审查起诉甚至法庭审理等司法行为的各个阶段,其作用重点就在于防止超期羁押,刑讯逼供,保障司法正义;同时过程证据作为一种形式上的程序性监督为程序性辩护提供了对应依据,特别是在现有条件下,通过过程证据的作用来弥补刑事诉讼中程序性裁判机制尚未有效形成、刑诉中的程序性保障不健全等理念与机制的欠缺具有一定的积极意义,但过程证据也具有其不足,为更好的发挥对程序性辩护的作用,需要予以完善。本文正文除绪论外共包括五个部分,分别是问题的提出和过程证据的界定、过程证据适用现状分析、域外过程证据的适用、过程证据作用的完善、对问题的回应以及总结。第一部分:问题的提出和过程证据的概说。这一部分首先通过介绍年度比较受关注的“雷洋案”来提出问题,然后通过问题引出过程证据的概说也就是其概念及其分类、特征,明确文章研究的对象为过程证据的适用;然后通过问题来引出过程证据在实践中需要解决什么;最后从程序、理念等方向说明过程证据需要完善的方向。第二部分:过程证据适用现状分析。这一部分首先介绍了过程证据的适用,也就是介绍了过程证据对刑事诉讼的作用;其次从过程证据适用不足以及问题来说明过程证据适用需要完善的必要性。第三部分:域外过程证据适用的程序性保障。这一部分从国外证据的相关法律制度入手,分别从英美法系和大陆法系两个方面,对美国、英国、德国、法国等国家在“过程证据”方面所做的规定进行梳理,并初步总结,从中得出我国过程证据适用完善路劲的启示。第四部分:过程证据适用用的完善。综合我国过程证据在刑事诉讼中适用的现状、存在的问题以及国外相关制度对我国的启示,分别从理念、程序以及配套制度等对我国刑事诉讼中过程证据适用完善路径提出建议。第五部分:对问题的回应以及总结。这一部分主要是对前文的总结,首先通过对开篇问题的回应从而引出过程证据完善路径具有的可行性建议进行总结,最后对制度进行展望。
[Abstract]:Process evidence is the material to prove the facts of the case process. In essence, it is a kind of judicial process behavior record. It runs through various stages of judicial acts, such as investigation, coercive measures, examination of prosecution and even trial by the court. Its role is to prevent prolonged detention, extort confessions by torture and guarantee judicial justice. Meanwhile, process evidence, as a formal procedural supervision, provides a corresponding basis for procedural defense, especially under existing conditions. Through the role of process evidence to make up for the criminal proceedings in the procedural adjudication mechanism has not been effectively formed, procedural protection in criminal proceedings is not perfect and lack of ideas and mechanisms have a certain positive significance, but process evidence also has its shortcomings. In order to play a better role in procedural defense, it needs to be perfected. Besides the introduction, the text of this paper consists of five parts, namely, the raising of the question and the definition of the process evidence, the analysis of the current situation of the application of the process evidence, and the application of the extraterritorial process evidence. Improvement of the role of process evidence, response to and summary of problems. Part I: introduction of questions and process evidence. This part first raises questions by introducing the "Lei Yang case", which has attracted more attention in the year. Then, it introduces the concept and classification of the process evidence through the problem, and defines the object of the article as the application of the process evidence. Then, it leads to what the process evidence needs to be solved in practice by the question. Finally, from the procedure, The second part: analysis of the application of process evidence. This part first introduces the application of process evidence, that is, the role of process evidence in criminal proceedings; Secondly, it explains the necessity of perfecting the application of process evidence from the point of insufficient application of process evidence and the problem. The third part: procedural guarantee of the application of extraterritorial process evidence. This part starts with the relevant legal system of foreign evidence. Respectively from the Anglo-American law system and the civil law system, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France and other countries in the "process evidence" aspects of the comb, and preliminary summary, Part 4th: the perfection of the application of process evidence. It synthesizes the current situation of the application of Chinese process evidence in criminal proceedings, the existing problems and the enlightenment of foreign related systems to our country. Respectively from the concept, procedure and supporting system to the criminal procedure in our country to apply the perfect path of the process evidence put forward suggestions. 5th part: response to the problem and summary. This part is the summary of the previous article, First, through the response to the opening question, the feasibility suggestions of the process evidence perfect path are summarized, and finally, the system is prospected.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】