法官办案责任追责的递进式模式探究

发布时间：2018-03-10 21:52

本文选题：责任追究　切入点：不当行为　出处：《法律适用》2017年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：司法责任制作为本次司法体制改革的核心,旨在通过制度设计寻求制衡法官肆意妄为与保障法官依法履行职责的平衡。但我国现有的相关制度规定在责任事由、不当行为的界定依据以及错误裁判责任追究的主观程度等方面均呈现出不一致性,使司法责任制的天平过多的压向司法裁判者一方,加剧了该群体被过度追责的担忧甚至恐惧。为此,应当借鉴英美国家以不当行为为核心的一元论追责模式和德法国家以不当行为和特定结果为核心的二元论追责模式的合理元素,结合我国法院司法改革的实际,构建以违反实体裁判合法性、程序正当性、裁判中立性、法官职业性等有违审判规律的行为为追究责任的前提和基础,以故意或者重大过失导致裁判错误并致严重后果的行为为从重追责情形,并豁免法定追责事由之外的所有情形的递进式法官办案责任追究模式,强化法官办案的心理预期。
[Abstract]:Judicial responsibility system, as the core of this judicial system reform, aims to seek balance between check and balance of judges' wanton behavior and guarantee that judges perform their duties according to law through system design. The definition basis of the misconduct and the subjective degree of the investigation of the wrong judgment responsibility show inconsistency, which makes the balance of the judicial responsibility system too much pressure on the judicial judge. Increased fears and even fears that the group would be overcharged. To that end, We should draw lessons from the reasonable elements of the monism accountability model in the Anglo-American countries with misconduct as the core and the dualism accountability pattern with the misconduct and the specific results as the core in Germany and France countries, and combine with the reality of the judicial reform in our country. The premise and foundation of investigating responsibility is to violate the legality of substantive adjudication, the legitimacy of procedure, the neutrality of adjudication, the professional nature of judges, and so on. The progressive mode of investigation of the judge's case responsibility is based on intentional or gross negligence, which leads to the error of judgment and serious consequences, and exempts all circumstances except the legal cause of liability, and strengthens the psychological expectation of the judge in handling the case.
【作者单位】：江苏省无锡市中级人民法院审判委员会;江苏省无锡市中级人民法院研究室;江苏省无锡市中级人民法院;
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】