政府信息公开行政案件中的举证责任

发布时间：2018-03-12 07:07

本文选题：政府信息公开　切入点：行政案件　出处：《上海交通大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》（以下简称《条例》）于2008年5月1日起施行，标志着全国范围内信息公开制度实践地正式展开。近年来，政府信息公开行政案件在行政审判中所占的比重逐年增加。但面对这一新兴领域，制度实践还存在诸多问题。随着政府信息公开工作的深入，电子政务地推广，公民维权意识地增强，政府信息公开行政案件中所涉政府信息的种类日益增加，涉诉行政机关涉及多个领域，行政机关败诉案件亦随之增加。导致败诉的原因分析有行政机关证据意识不强，对举证规则认识不足等等，反映出应诉能力有待提高。由此可见，举证责任在政府信息公开行政案件审判中的重要性。举证是审判活动中重要的一环，对后续的质证、认证有决定性影响。举证规则为法官辨别真相提供了较为客观的依据，也是确定当事人胜诉或败诉的一个重要尺度。本文即以上海法院近年来审理的政府信息公开案件为研究对象，对审理过程中不同情形下的举证责任进行分析，总结经验，，粗略地概括审理思路。除序言外，包括四章：第一章对上海法院政府信息公开行政案件情况进行概述，突显政府信息公开行政案件与普通行政案件的不同及其特点。对信息公开案件中行政机关败诉原因进行分析，从而突出举证责任的重要性。第二章结合案例对政府信息不存在情形下的举证责任分配进行了较详细地分析，明确了原、被告的举证责任。第三章结合案例对免于公开政府信息情形下的举证责任进行探讨，明确涉国家秘密案件；涉商业秘密、个人隐私案件以及“三安全一稳定”案件三类情形下的举证责任的分配。第四章结合案例对其他类型，如“拒绝更正情形”下和涉及“三需要”案件中举证责任的分配提出审理的基本思路。
[Abstract]:The "regulations of the Government of the people's Republic of China" (hereinafter referred to as "the regulations") came into effect on May 1st 2008, marking the formal development of the nationwide information disclosure system in practice. The proportion of government information publicity administrative cases in administrative trials is increasing year by year. However, in the face of this new field, there are still many problems in the system practice. Citizens' awareness of safeguarding rights has increased, and the types of government information involved in government information disclosure administrative cases are increasing, and the administrative organs involved in litigation involve many fields. The reasons leading to the loss of the case are that the administrative organs have not strong sense of evidence, lack of understanding of the rules of proof, and so on, which reflects the need to improve the ability to respond to the case. Thus, it can be seen that, The importance of the burden of proof in the trial of open government information administrative cases. Proof is an important part of trial activities, which has a decisive effect on subsequent cross-examination and authentication. The rule of proof provides a more objective basis for judges to discern the truth. It is also an important yardstick to determine the litigant's victory or defeat. This paper takes the public government information cases tried by Shanghai Court in recent years as the research object, analyzes the burden of proof under different circumstances in the trial process, sums up the experience and roughly generalizes the thinking of the trial. In addition to the preface, it includes four chapters:. In the first chapter, the author summarizes the administrative cases in Shanghai court, highlights the differences and characteristics between the administrative cases and the ordinary administrative cases, and analyzes the reasons for the failure of the administrative organs in the cases of information disclosure. In order to highlight the importance of the burden of proof. The second chapter analyzes the distribution of the burden of proof in the absence of government information and clarifies the burden of proof of the original defendant. The third chapter discusses the burden of proof in case of exemption from disclosure of government information, and clarifies cases involving state secrets; trade secrets; The distribution of burden of proof in personal privacy cases and cases of "three security and one stability". Chapter 4th puts forward the basic thinking of hearing other types of cases, such as the case of "refusal to correct" and the distribution of the burden of proof in cases involving "three needs".
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1;D925.3

【参考文献】