试论刑事非法证据排除规则

发布时间：2018-03-13 06:04

本文选题：刑事证据　切入点：非法证据　出处：《苏州大学》2004年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：刑事非法证据排除规则是刑事证据规则的重要组成部分。它起源于美国,经过一百多年的传播,该规则已为世界大多数国家的刑事证据立法所采纳,并成为一项刑事诉讼的国际准则。在我国,刑事非法证据排除规则刚刚开始构建,许多理论和实践问题还在不断探讨之中。本文愿通过对该规则的研究,为完善我国的非法证据排除规则提供一定的参考。本文的结构共分五个部分。第一部分是非法证据概述,它界定了刑事非法证据的概念和种类;第二部分是各国及联合国非法证据排除规则的比较研究,它通过比较法的角度对美、英、德、日及联合国有关文件中规定的非法证据排除规则进行了研究;第三部分是非法证据排除规则的价值分析,系统分析了该规则的确立对维护宪法尊严、保障公民人权、提高审判公信力、规范警察取证行为的作用;第四部分是我国刑事诉讼中的非法证据排除规则,分析了我国关于刑事非法证据排除规则的立法和司法状况以及我国理论界对该规则的各种学说;第五部分是构建我国刑事非法证据排除规则的设想,在该部分笔者提出了在我国对各类刑事非法证据的处置原则、非法证据排除的适用程序、证明责任和证明标准以及构建非法证据排除规则的配套措施。
[Abstract]:The rule of exclusion of criminal illegal evidence is an important part of the rule of criminal evidence. It originated in the United States. After more than 100 years of dissemination, the rule has been adopted by the criminal evidence legislation of most countries in the world. And become an international standard of criminal procedure. In our country, the rule of exclusion of criminal illegal evidence has just begun to be constructed, and many theoretical and practical problems are still under discussion. In order to improve the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence in China to provide a certain reference. The structure of this paper is divided into five parts. The first part is an overview of illegal evidence, which defines the concept and types of criminal illegal evidence. The second part is a comparative study of the exclusionary rules of illegal evidence between countries and the United Nations. It studies the exclusion rules of illegal evidence stipulated in the relevant documents of the United States, Britain, Germany, Japan and the United Nations from the perspective of comparative law. The third part is an analysis of the value of the exclusionary rules of illegal evidence. This paper systematically analyzes the role of the establishment of this rule in safeguarding the dignity of the Constitution, protecting the human rights of citizens, improving the credibility of the trial and standardizing the police's behavior of obtaining evidence. Part 4th is the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence in criminal proceedings in our country. This paper analyzes the legislative and judicial situation of the exclusion rules of criminal illegal evidence in China and the various theories of the rules in the theoretical circle of our country. Part 5th is the assumption of constructing the exclusion rules of criminal illegal evidence in our country. In this part, the author puts forward the disposal principle of all kinds of criminal illegal evidence in our country, the applicable procedure of illegal evidence exclusion, the burden of proof and the standard of proof, as well as the supporting measures to construct the exclusion rule of illegal evidence.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2004
【分类号】：D925.23

【引证文献】