行政诉讼原告资格的多层次构造

发布时间：2018-03-13 13:54

本文选题：行政诉讼　切入点：原告资格　出处：《中外法学》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国实定法从未以某种一般性标准统合行政诉讼原告资格的所有情形。当前理论界和实务界倾向于宽泛地理解"利害关系"标准的适用范围,但将该标准适用于某些类型的案件,颇有错位之感,且易使该标准的解释走向混乱。从当前实定法出发,应将行政诉讼原告资格区分为三个层次,即行政相对人的原告资格、行政行为相关人的原告资格以及基于客观诉讼契机的特殊情形。行政相对人通常具有原告资格,但对于不履行法定职责的案件,应区分不同情况;行政行为相关人的原告资格可以以利害关系标准为基石,借助保护规范理论予以判断;原告资格转移、行政公益诉讼以及受害人诉讼,则更适于作为客观诉讼加以把握,但对于何种案件属于受害人诉讼的认定不应过于宽泛。
[Abstract]:The real law of our country has never integrated all the cases of the plaintiff qualification of administrative litigation with some general standard. At present, the theoretical and practical circles tend to understand broadly the scope of application of the "interest" standard. However, applying this standard to certain types of cases has a sense of dislocation and tends to cause confusion in the interpretation of the standard. Starting from the current actual law, the plaintiff's qualification in administrative litigation should be divided into three levels, that is, the plaintiff's qualification of the administrative counterpart, that is, the plaintiff's qualification of the administrative counterpart. The plaintiff qualification of the administrative act related person and the special situation based on the objective litigation opportunity. The administrative counterpart usually has the plaintiff qualification, but for the case which does not perform the legal duty, should distinguish the different situation; The plaintiff qualification of administrative act related person can be judged by the theory of protection norm, and the plaintiff qualification transfer, administrative public interest litigation and victim action are more suitable to be grasped as objective litigation. However, the determination of which cases belong to the victim action should not be too broad.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(项目名称:行政规制决策影响分析机制研究;项目编号:20720151194)
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】