行政诉讼补充证据规则的重构

发布时间：2018-03-18 04:15

本文选题：行政诉讼　切入点：证据补充规则　出处：《中共重庆市委党校》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：为制约行政机关在实体法律关系中的行政权力,保证法律关系主体间的平等关系,我国《行政诉讼法》在证据规则方面已有许多规定。作为行政诉讼中核心问题之一的行政诉讼证据制度,它既是当事人进行行政诉讼、维护自己合法权益的武器,也是人民法院查明案件事实、辨别争议事实真伪的工具。由于社会经济的飞速发展,使得在行政诉讼中行政纠纷也变得越来越多元化和复杂化,同时也表现出人们对行政诉讼的重视程度越来越高。因此,在行政诉讼中证据规则这一核心问题也越发变得尤为重要,不得不承认证据规则俨然是整个行政诉讼程序中的关键,而其中的证据补充规则对案件真相的查明则有着举足轻重的作用,只有正确把握证据规则,补充对案件有效的证据,才能更好地提高庭审的有效性和准确性。目前我国行政诉讼证据补充规则还存在一定的问题,我国一部分学者对其进行了重构和反思,但研究成果多集中于法定或指定举证期限内的举证责任分配上,对司法实践中大量存在的超过法定或指定举证期限补充证据的现象并未给予充分的关注,这种重构还存在一定的问题,对行政诉讼证据补充规则的完善作用微乎其微。因此本文将从行政诉讼证据补充规则的内涵、分类、构成要件以及特点出发,在比较我国与国外行政诉讼补充证据规则的基础上考虑,通过对我国行政诉讼证据补充规则现状进行反思,并尝试分析其中存在的问题,以及对问题的原因进行再思考,为行政诉讼补充证据规则指明方向,分析重构的现状,找出重构存在的问题,最后指出具体的重构对策,最后将会对未来的我国行政诉讼证据补充规则制度的走向进行探索和研究,提出相应的建议,以期望能够为我国行政诉讼案件的审理提供一定的参考指导作用。
[Abstract]:In order to restrict the administrative power of the administrative organs in the substantive legal relations and to guarantee the equal relations between the subjects of the legal relations, As one of the core issues in administrative litigation, the evidence system of administrative litigation is a weapon for the parties to carry out administrative proceedings and safeguard their legitimate rights and interests. It is also a tool for the people's courts to find out the facts of the case and to distinguish the truth of the disputed facts. As a result of the rapid development of social economy, administrative disputes have become more and more diversified and complicated in administrative litigation. At the same time, it also shows that people pay more and more attention to administrative litigation. Therefore, the core issue of the rule of evidence in administrative litigation becomes more and more important, and it has to be admitted that the rule of evidence is the key in the whole administrative procedure. But the supplementary rule of evidence plays an important role in finding out the truth of the case. Only by correctly grasping the rules of evidence and supplementing the evidence that is effective to the case, Only then can we improve the validity and accuracy of the trial. At present, there are still some problems in the supplementary rules of evidence in administrative litigation in our country, and some scholars in our country have reconstructed and reflected on them. However, most of the research results focus on the distribution of the burden of proof within the statutory or specified period of proof, and insufficient attention has been paid to the phenomenon that a large number of cases exist in judicial practice to supplement evidence beyond the statutory or specified time limit of proof. There are still some problems in this reconstruction, which have little effect on the perfection of the supplementary rules of evidence in administrative litigation. Therefore, this paper will proceed from the connotation, classification, constitutive elements and characteristics of the supplementary rules of evidence in administrative litigation. On the basis of comparing the rules of supplementary evidence in administrative litigation between our country and foreign countries, this paper reflects on the present situation of the supplementary rules of evidence in administrative litigation of our country, and tries to analyze the existing problems and the reasons for the problems. Pointing out the direction for the rules of supplementary evidence in administrative litigation, analyzing the present situation of reconstruction, finding out the problems existing in the reconstruction, and finally pointing out the concrete countermeasures of reconstruction. Finally, it will explore and study the trend of the system of supplementary rules of administrative litigation evidence in our country in the future, and put forward corresponding suggestions in order to provide some reference and guidance for the trial of administrative litigation cases in our country.
【学位授予单位】：中共重庆市委党校
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】