论我国民事执行权配置改革

发布时间：2018-03-18 20:17

本文选题：民事执行权配置　切入点：执行裁决权　出处：《华东政法大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国民事执行权配置一直以来都面临着执行效率和执行公正两大困境。在社会经济快速发展、社会关系日趋复杂、财产形态日趋多样化的当今社会,执行问题更是显得十分突出。执行效率和执行公正困境的解决对于维护当事人的合法权益、稳定社会经济秩序、完善社会主义法治建设具有重要意义,党和国家领导集体向来十分关注。2015年中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅下发的《关于贯彻落实党的十八届四中全会决定进一步深化司法体制和社会体制改革的实施方案》(简称“《实施方案》”)对于未来执行权外分及分权运行的改革方向提出了要求,但具体如何实施目前尚未明确。本文从回顾我国民事执行权配置的演变开始,分析了民事执行权配置现存困境及成因,在借鉴域外经验的基础上,提出了民事执行权配置改革措施的设想。第一部分,分析了民事执行权配置的演变,并对当前的改革探索活动的进行总结。第二部分,分析了我国民事执行权配置存在的效率困境和公正困境,并深入探讨了困境存在的成因。第三部分,分析了域外主要的民事执行权配置模式,对域外实践中可供参考的经验进行归纳。第四部分,在考量理论因素、历史因素、现实因素和域外因素的基础上,提出了外设的执行局、完善执行局垂直统一管理体制、内设编入审判庭序列的执行裁决庭、建立执行裁决庭与执行局的联动运行机制、构建执行官和执行法官制度的五方面措施。
[Abstract]:The allocation of civil execution power in our country has always been faced with two major dilemmas: execution efficiency and enforcement justice. In today's society, with the rapid development of social economy, the increasingly complex social relations and the increasingly diversified forms of property, China is faced with the following problems: 1. The problem of execution is even more prominent. It is of great significance to solve the dilemma of execution efficiency and justice to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, to stabilize the social and economic order, and to perfect the construction of socialist rule of law. The Party and the state leadership have always been very concerned. In 2015, the General Office of the CPC Central Committee, The implementation Plan for further deepening the Reform of the Judicial and Social system issued by the General Office of the State Council in the fourth Plenary session of the 18 CPC Central Committee. The direction of reform put forward the requirements, However, how to implement it is not clear at present. This paper begins with the review of the evolution of civil execution power allocation in China, analyzes the existing predicament and causes of civil execution power allocation, and draws lessons from the experience of foreign countries. The first part analyzes the evolution of civil execution power allocation, and summarizes the current reform and exploration activities. This paper analyzes the efficiency dilemma and justice dilemma of civil execution power allocation in China, and probes into the causes of the dilemma. In part 4th, on the basis of consideration of theoretical, historical, realistic and extraterritorial factors, the Executive Board of peripherals is proposed and the vertical unified management system of the Executive Board is improved. There are five measures in the system of executive officer and executive judge, which are composed of the execution court of the trial court sequence, the establishment of the linkage operation mechanism between the execution court and the executive board, and the construction of the executive officer and executive judge system.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】