我国刑事立案监督制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-19 09:20

本文选题：刑事立案　切入点：刑事立案监督　出处：《湖南师范大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：刑事立案监督是对侦查机关立案活动实施的法律监督。人民检察院作为国家法律监督机关,刑事立案监督是宪法和刑事诉讼法赋予它的重要职能。但是,我国目前关于刑事立案监督的立法尚不完善,主要存在监督对象单一、监督范围狭窄、监督手段乏力等缺陷。同时,在司法实践中也存在诸多问题和困难,主要表现在案件来源和渠道不畅、启动条件难成共识、法律监督效果不佳等方面。笔者试结合工作实际,从理论和实践两个方面探讨我国现行的刑事立案监督制度,并就进一步完善该项制度提出几点思考。在立法上,需要进一步增加监督对象、扩大监督范围、强化监督手段；在实践中,主要通过拓宽线索来源渠道、明确启动监督程序的条件、规范监督程序,进一步完善适合我国国情和司法特色的刑事立案监督机制,推进公正廉洁执法,提升司法公信力。
[Abstract]:The supervision of criminal case filing is the legal supervision of the filing activities of investigation organs. As the state legal supervisory organ, the supervision of criminal filing is an important function entrusted to it by the Constitution and the Criminal procedure Law. At present, the legislation on the supervision of criminal case filing in our country is not perfect. There are many defects, such as the single object of supervision, the narrow scope of supervision and the lack of supervision means. At the same time, there are many problems and difficulties in the judicial practice. This paper mainly shows that the source and channel of the case is not smooth, the starting condition is difficult to reach a consensus, the legal supervision effect is not good and so on. The author tries to discuss the current criminal filing supervision system of our country from the two aspects of theory and practice. In legislation, we need to further increase the object of supervision, expand the scope of supervision and strengthen the means of supervision. It is necessary to clarify the conditions for starting the supervision procedure, standardize the supervision procedure, further improve the supervision mechanism of criminal case that is suitable for our country's national conditions and judicial characteristics, promote the impartial and honest law enforcement, and enhance the judicial credibility.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】