论刑事速裁程序中被告人权利保障

发布时间：2018-03-20 17:17

本文选题：刑事案件　切入点：刑事速裁程序　出处：《延边大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来,一方面,盗窃罪、危险驾驶罪等轻微刑事犯罪不断激增;另一方面,法官员额制、以审判为中心等制度的推行导致我国基层法院司法人员数量不足,两方面矛盾不断突显。为了尽快解决矛盾,保障民众心理的安定,社会的平稳,维护司法的权威,参照美国、德国等国家的司法实践,结合成本和效益的原则,我国从2014年开始,开展了刑事速裁的试点工作。从各地的试点结果分析,刑事速裁程序不仅是解决当前呈爆炸式增长案件数量的有力武器,也有缓解羁押场所人满为患,减轻被告人身心负担和缓和社会矛盾等功能。在刑事速裁程序中,对被告人权利保障有着更加突出的意义,因为刑事速裁程序的缩减本身就是对被告人部分权益的剥夺,因此应该加大对被告人保护的力度。如何调和以"公正"为核心的被告人的权利和以"效率"为本质的刑事速裁程序?如何保障让渡自己部分权益以实现程序高效的被告人得到量刑上的"优惠"?被告人权利保障不仅是刑事速裁程序灵魂和生命力所在,也是刑事诉讼法的价值核心。本文分为四个相互衔接的部分,内容如下:第一部分是引言,对刑事速裁程序产生的背景、研究现状进行了梳理,阐述了研究的目的和意义,选定了研究的范围,研究方法主要是通过分析庭审过程、案件比例以及试点地区情况进行数据分析。第二部分是刑事速裁程序权利配置的概述,通过对制度的发展进行回顾,对基本概念进行界定,并对现行的立法上对被告人的权利配置进行归纳分析。第三部分是对被告人权利保障的实证分析,对立法现状进行回顾,根据司法现状中典型案例的庭审过程,对刑事速裁程序的案件分布情况、庭审比例进行分析,归纳优秀试点法院的制度特色,在综合以上内容,寻找在司法实践中和立法中对被告人权利保护的薄弱部分并加以分析。第四部分是完善刑事速裁程序中被告人权利配置,主要根据司法实践中和立法中薄弱部分,通过归纳分析试点法院值得借鉴的经验,结合实际,提出全流程优化程序、建立法律援助总部等完善建议。本文主张对于刑事速裁中能够简化省略的程序应该尽可能的予以压缩,如省略不必要的案件流转、如建立机关之间的信息共享系统等方面。但对于有利于保障的被告人权益的程序,不应该因程序缩减而进行压缩,与普通程序相比较,应该更加注重对被告人权利方面的细节完善。
[Abstract]:In recent years, on the one hand, the number of minor criminal offences, such as theft, dangerous driving, and so on, has been proliferating; on the other hand, the implementation of the system of judges' posts and trial-centered has led to a shortage of judicial personnel in our country's grass-roots courts. In order to resolve the contradiction as soon as possible, to ensure the psychological stability of the public, to maintain social stability, to safeguard the judicial authority, and to refer to the judicial practice of the United States, Germany and other countries, and to combine the principles of cost and efficiency, Since 2014, our country has carried out the pilot work of criminal speedy adjudication. From the analysis of the results of the pilot cases in various places, the criminal speedy adjudication procedure is not only a powerful weapon to solve the current explosive increase in the number of cases, but also a way to alleviate overcrowding in places of detention. In the criminal adjudication procedure, the protection of the defendant's rights has more prominent significance, because the reduction of the criminal quick adjudication procedure itself is the deprivation of part of the defendant's rights and interests. Therefore, we should strengthen the protection of the defendant. How to reconcile the rights of the accused with "justice" as the core and the criminal adjudication procedure with "efficiency" as the essence? How to ensure the transfer of part of their rights and interests in order to achieve efficient procedures of the defendant to obtain the sentencing of "preferential"? The protection of the defendant's rights is not only the soul and vitality of the criminal procedure, but also the core of the value of the criminal procedure law. This paper is divided into four parts, the contents are as follows: the first part is the introduction, In this paper, the background and the present situation of the criminal quick adjudication procedure are reviewed, the purpose and significance of the research are expounded, the scope of the research is selected, and the research method is mainly through the analysis of the trial process. The second part is an overview of the allocation of the rights of criminal quick adjudication procedure, through the review of the development of the system, the basic concepts are defined. The third part is the empirical analysis of the protection of the rights of the defendant, the review of the current legislative situation, according to the trial process of typical cases in the current judicial situation, the third part is the empirical analysis of the protection of the rights of the defendant, the third part is the empirical analysis of the protection of the rights of the defendant. By analyzing the distribution of cases and the proportion of court hearings in criminal speedy adjudication procedures, summarizing the system characteristics of excellent pilot courts, and synthesizing the above contents, To find and analyze the weak part of the protection of defendant's rights in judicial practice and legislation. Part 4th is to perfect the disposition of defendant's right in criminal procedure, mainly according to the weak part of judicial practice and legislation. Through summing up and analyzing the experience of the trial court and combining with the practice, the whole process optimization procedure is put forward. This paper argues that the procedure that can simplify and omit in criminal adjudication should be reduced as much as possible, such as omitting unnecessary cases. For example, the establishment of information sharing systems between organs. However, the procedures that are conducive to the protection of the rights and interests of the defendants should not be compressed by the reduction of the procedures, as compared with the ordinary procedures. More attention should be paid to improving the details of the defendant's rights.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】