媒体报道与刑事审判的冲突与平衡

发布时间：2018-03-21 14:37

本文选题：刑事审判　切入点：媒体报道　出处：《海南大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：大众传媒、网络和自媒体的迅速发展,使得信息的传播渠道更为广泛,传播和获取信息也变得更加便捷,在这样一个信息爆炸的时代,信息传播所带来的影响力不容小觑。而伴随着公民民主意识的增强和法治建设的进步,公民的参与社会管理的愿望也愈加迫切。司法权是公共权力的一种,属于社会监督的范畴,但是媒体报道与刑事审判存在着冲突和矛盾。本文通过讨论媒体报道与刑事审判的冲突现状,分析冲突的本质,并借鉴外国经验来寻求平衡二者关系的路径。本文分为四个部分:第一部分主要探讨媒体报道与刑事审判的立法依据,包括媒体的新闻自由,公众的知情权和监督权等内容,并阐释了权利来源与刑事审判的关系。认为媒体报道的权利源自于公众的言论自由和知情权,是公民参与社会事务、进行舆论监督的基础。新闻报道是进行舆论监督和满足民众知情权的重要途径。第二部分阐述我国媒体报道与刑事审判的现状,通过评析典型刑事案例来阐释媒体报道与刑事审判在实务中的境况,分析媒体报道如何影响刑事审判。媒体报道对刑事审判不仅有积极方面的影响,也有消极的影响。发生冲突的原因在于,两者在价值取向和所承担的社会职能不同,这造就了冲突的产生。第三部分对域外处理刑事审判与新闻媒体关系的经验进行分析借鉴,主要探讨英国和美国的立法和相关实践经验。通过分析英美两国在处理司法审判与媒体新闻报道关系中普遍的做法和在一些具体制度设置,借鉴能为我国所用的有益经验、举措。第四部分提出用于平衡媒体报道与刑事审判关系的有价值的建议。主张完善相应的制度,在各自领域遵守职业操守。也不能为了审判的独立和公正盲目地限制媒体报道,应该建立一种良好的沟通合作机制,科学合理地构建媒体报道与刑事审判的关系。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of the mass media, the network and the self-media has made the dissemination of information more extensive, and the dissemination and access to information have become more convenient. In such an era of information explosion, The influence brought by information dissemination cannot be underestimated. With the strengthening of citizen's democratic consciousness and the progress of the rule of law, the citizen's desire to participate in social management becomes more and more urgent. Judicial power is a kind of public power. It belongs to the category of social supervision, but there are conflicts and contradictions between media report and criminal trial. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part mainly discusses the legislative basis of media report and criminal trial, including the media freedom of the press, the public's right to know and the right to supervise, etc. It also explains the relationship between the source of the right and the criminal trial. It holds that the right to media report originates from the public's freedom of speech and the right to know, and it is the participation of citizens in social affairs. The basis of public opinion supervision. News report is an important way to supervise public opinion and satisfy the people's right to know. The second part expounds the current situation of media report and criminal trial in our country. Through the analysis of typical criminal cases to explain the situation of media reports and criminal trials in practice, and to analyze how media reports affect criminal trials. Media reports not only have a positive impact on criminal trials, There is also a negative impact. The reason for the conflict is that the value orientation and social functions of the two are different, which has created the conflict. The third part analyzes the experience of dealing with the relationship between the criminal trial and the news media. This paper mainly discusses the legislation and relevant practical experience of the United Kingdom and the United States. By analyzing the common practices in handling the relationship between judicial trial and media news reports in Britain and the United States and setting up some specific systems, we can learn from the useful experience that can be used for our country. The initiative. Part 4th presents valuable recommendations for balancing the relationship between media reporting and criminal justice. It advocates the improvement of the corresponding system and the observance of professional conduct in their respective fields. Nor should they blindly restrict media coverage for the sake of the independence and impartiality of the trial, A good communication and cooperation mechanism should be established, and the relationship between media report and criminal trial should be constructed scientifically and reasonably.
【学位授予单位】：海南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G206;D926.2

【相似文献】