庭审实质化背景下法官的庭前阅卷制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-21 16:28

本文选题：法官庭前阅卷　切入点：案卷移送　出处：《西南石油大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：法官的庭前阅卷行为被认为是预断形成的源头,阅卷预断对刑事诉讼各环节特别是庭审程序的推进和自由心证的形成都能造成较大的影响,是阻碍庭审实质化实现的主要原因之一。完善法官庭前阅卷制度的主要目的,就是为了预防阅卷预断影响到刑事案件的实体审理。在我国目前大力推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革之大背景下,从法官的庭前阅卷规则入手,完善法官的庭前阅卷制度,以实现预断阻却,是诉讼制度改革的应有之义。从广义上来讲,法官庭前阅卷分为"阅"与"卷"两个部分,案卷的移送方式决定了法官庭前能阅之卷的内容,作为阅卷行为的客体,对案卷移送制度的变化及其对法官庭前阅卷的影响是探讨法官庭前阅卷制度的基础。本文从我国先后三种案卷移送制度的变化入手,阐明了由案卷移送方式决定的案卷内容之多寡对法官庭前阅卷的影响即对阅卷预断形成的影响;再对域外采用不同案卷移送制度的国家在预断阻却方面的制度设计作了分析比较,总结出可借鉴之处;最后联系我国目前法官庭前阅卷制度存在的问题,以阅卷预断的阻却为中心,借鉴外国优秀制度设计,除了对阅卷制度本身加以完善以实现预断阻却之外,还辅之以配套措施,从预断与庭审实质化之间对立统一的关系入手,以实现庭审的实质化为导向,以消除庭前阅卷的负面效应为目的,以切断阅卷预断对判决结果产生负面影响之路径为手段,完善庭前阅卷制度。
[Abstract]:Judge's pre-court marking behavior is considered to be the source of the formation of prejudgment, which can have a great impact on all aspects of criminal proceedings, especially the advance of court proceedings and the formation of free psychological evidence. It is one of the main reasons that hinder the realization of the materialization of the trial. In order to prevent the prejudging of file marking from affecting the substantive trial of criminal cases. Under the background of vigorously promoting the reform of the trial centered litigation system in our country at present, starting with the judges' pre-court marking rules, we can improve the judges' pre-court marking system. It is the proper meaning of the reform of the litigation system to realize the prejudging obstruction. In a broad sense, the judge's pre-court examination is divided into two parts: "read" and "volume", and the transfer mode of the case file determines the content of the volume that the judge can read before the court. As the object of the marking behavior, the change of the case file transfer system and its influence on the judge's pre-court filing system are the basis of the discussion of the judge's pre-court filing system. This paper begins with the changes of the three kinds of case file transfer system in China. This paper expounds the influence of the content of the case file which is decided by the transfer mode of the case file on the judge's pre-court file reading, that is, the influence on the formation of the prejudgment of the case file. Then the paper analyzes and compares the system design of the countries that adopt different transfer systems of case files abroad in the aspect of prejudging obstruction, and summarizes the points that can be used for reference. Finally, the problems existing in the system of judges' pre-court marking in our country are analyzed and compared. Taking the obstruction of prejudgment as the center and drawing lessons from the design of foreign excellent systems, in addition to perfecting the marking system itself to realize the pre-judgment, it is supplemented by supporting measures, starting with the unity of opposites between the prejudgment and the materialization of the trial. In order to realize the essence of the trial as the direction, to eliminate the negative effect of the pre-court marking, to cut off the path of the pre-judgment to the result of judgment as a means, to improve the system of pre-court marking.
【学位授予单位】：西南石油大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】