我国民事诉讼中当事人缺席规制之检讨

发布时间：2018-03-22 01:13

本文选题：缺席　切入点：言词辩论　出处：《法商研究》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在民事诉讼中,出席庭审参加言词辩论乃当事人在诉讼法上的负担而非诉讼义务,缺席的本质乃当事人对该诉讼法上负担的不履行。《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》关于当事人缺席之规制并不科学,主要表现为对双方当事人同时缺席处理的缺失以及不正当地区分原、被告缺席而作不同之处理。这种制度安排不仅有违平等原则,也不符合民事诉讼的基本原理。《民事诉讼法解释》第174条第2款关于拘传原告的规定更是严重违反了法律保留原则。完善我国民事诉讼当事人缺席之规制制度不仅应当立足于缺席的性质,更应遵循民事诉讼运行的内在规律。
[Abstract]:In civil proceedings, it is the party's burden in the procedural law rather than the duty of litigation to attend the hearing and participate in the speech debate. The essence of absence is the failure of the parties to fulfill the burden of the procedural law. The rules governing the absence of the parties in the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China are not scientific. This kind of institutional arrangement is not only against the principle of equality, but also shows the absence of both parties and the improper division of the original and the absence of the defendant. It also does not accord with the basic principle of civil action. Article 174, paragraph 2, of the interpretation of the Civil procedure Law on the arrest of the plaintiff is a serious violation of the principle of legal reservation. Should be based only on the nature of absence, More should follow the internal law of the operation of civil proceedings.
【作者单位】：武汉大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(17BFX053) 国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心项目
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】