非诉行政案件裁执分离模式再思考

发布时间：2018-03-23 04:38

本文选题：非诉行政执行　切入点：裁执分离　出处：《行政法学研究》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：非诉行政案件裁执分离模式在学理和实践中遭遇不同境遇,这缘于理论界和实务界对非诉行政执行的认识和定位存在差异。尽管该模式遇到各种新问题,但是从法规范结构比重、司法数据支撑以及法治政策导向来看,还是有必要继续坚守,其理论正当性和法律依据问题,可以从分权制衡、司法适度能动、职能分离等实质法治主义角度得以诠释,人权保障、正当高效、分离协作应作为其运行的基本原则,在案件管辖上仍应坚持普通法院为主,不宜全部划给跨区划法院,案件类型上宜采取全面裁执分离思路,案件执行上应实现执行程序的规范化、责任承担的合理化、府院关系的正常化。
[Abstract]:The mode of separation of adjudication and enforcement in non-litigation administrative cases encounters different circumstances in theory and practice, which is due to the differences in the understanding and orientation of non-litigation administrative execution between theoretical and practical circles, although the model has encountered various new problems. However, it is necessary to continue to stick to the legal normative structure, the support of judicial data and the guidance of the rule of law policy. The theoretical legitimacy and the legal basis can be determined from the separation of powers and checks and balances, judicial moderate action. The essence of the rule of law, such as separation of functions, can be interpreted, human rights are guaranteed, proper and efficient, separation and cooperation should be regarded as the basic principle of its operation, and the jurisdiction of cases should still adhere to ordinary courts, not all of them should be assigned to cross-district courts. On the type of cases, it is advisable to adopt the idea of the separation of comprehensive adjudication and enforcement, and to realize the standardization of execution procedure, the rationalization of responsibility and the normalization of the relationship between government and hospital.
【作者单位】：齐鲁工业大学文法学院;北京大学法学院;
【基金】：齐鲁工业大学2016年人文社科校级规划重点项目“裁执分离视阀下非诉行政执行问题研究”(SKXMZ1602)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.1;D925.3

【相似文献】