辩诉交易之本土适用:一场未完成的变革

发布时间：2018-03-24 05:18

本文选题：辩诉交易　切入点：中国适用　出处：《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：司法改革逐步迈入深水区,以审判为中心、庭审实质化、员额制等诸项改革措施的有序推进要求优化有限司法资源的配置、完善案件的繁简分流。辩诉交易作为认罪认罚从宽制度的一个重要参照,正式被纳入司法改革的探索范畴。研究辩诉交易之中国适用实际上是在探讨一种法律制度的移植,必然要考虑中国的现实语境。辩诉交易在中国的现实语境中虽有观念、制度、法律层面的水土不服之处,但也不乏与我国传统文化和司法实践相契合的生命力。我国所移植的辩诉交易更多的应是一种程序理念而非一种制度设计。对不起诉、刑事速裁程序、刑事和解程序、简易程序等源自本土的辩诉交易有益实践进行整合、梳理与拓展更能克服制度碰撞产生的"排异现象",促进不同法律传统交融、培育适应我国国情的辩诉交易制度。本土资源整合之后所形成的认罪认罚从宽制度体系仅仅是静态层面的辩诉交易。辩诉交易的运行尚需要二元递进式的程序设计、证据开示、沉默权、律师参与等制度保障作有效支撑。
[Abstract]:The judicial reform has gradually entered the deep water area, with the trial as the center, the trial being substantial, and the orderly promotion of the post system and other reform measures, which requires the optimization of the allocation of limited judicial resources. As an important reference for the lenient system of plea pleas, plea bargaining is formally brought into the scope of judicial reform. To study the application of plea bargaining in China is actually to explore the transplantation of a legal system. It is necessary to consider the real context of China. Although plea bargaining has some ideas, systems, and legal aspects in China's real context, However, there is no lack of vitality in keeping with our traditional culture and judicial practice. The plea bargaining transplanted in our country should be more a kind of procedural idea than a kind of system design. Summary procedure and other beneficial practice of plea bargaining from the local integration, combing and expanding can overcome the phenomenon of "rejection", and promote the blending of different legal traditions. The system of plea bargaining, which is formed after the integration of local resources, is only a static plea bargaining system. The operation of plea bargaining still needs a binary progressive procedure design. The right to silence and the participation of lawyers are supported effectively.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】