风险规制与司法救济:从行政预测决定到风险警示

发布时间：2018-03-26 01:30

本文选题：行政预测决定　切入点：风险警示　出处：《甘肃政法学院学报》2014年03期

【摘要】：风险规制中常用的风险警示一般会给风险事物相关人权益造成重大影响,为了进行有效的法律救济,有的观点尝试把风险警示定位为行政法律行为。但是,孤立地看待风险警示可能无法准确地解读其性质,并会造成和现有行政行为理论体系的冲突。从过程功能主义的视角来看,风险警示本质上是行政机关在做出行政预测决定的基础上公布决定内容,从而向公众提供风险资讯信息的行为,属于行政事实行为的范畴。风险事物相关人虽不能针对风险警示提起行政诉讼,但可根据境外司法审查行政预测决定的经验,诉请审查行政预测决定并结合预防性不作为诉讼等特殊制度和适当的审查标准,达到对相关风险规制行为予以司法救济的目的。
[Abstract]:The risk warning commonly used in risk regulation generally has a great impact on the rights and interests of people concerned with risk matters. In order to carry out effective legal relief, some viewpoints try to position risk warning as administrative legal behavior. Looking at risk warning in isolation may not be able to interpret its nature accurately, and will result in conflict with the existing administrative behavior theory system. Risk warning is essentially an act by which an administrative organ, on the basis of making an administrative prediction decision, publishes the content of the decision, thereby providing the public with information on the risks. Belonging to the category of administrative factual behavior. Although the person concerned in the matter of risk cannot file an administrative lawsuit against the risk warning, he may, according to the experience of the administrative forecast decision of the judicial review abroad, Applying to review the decision of administrative forecast and combining with the special system such as preventive omission litigation and proper standard of examination, the aim of judicial remedy is to provide judicial relief to the relevant risk regulation behavior.
【作者单位】：天津师范大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.1;D925.3

【相似文献】