当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

论行政政策在法院的适用

发布时间:2018-03-26 02:33

  本文选题:行政政策 切入点:法院 出处:《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:由于社会发展速度的加快,法律囿于其稳定具有一定的落后性,同样作为政治管理工具的政策,因其不同于法律的特性,在当今社会中发挥着越来越重要的作用。具有法律意义的行政政策作为政策在行政领域的分支,对诉讼的影响也日益加大。行政政策的适用主要是指作为裁判依据的适用和作为审查对象的适用,我国并无对行政政策的司法审查制度,西方国家对此的经验对我国具有借鉴意义。行政政策在法院的适用主要有三种方式:一是将行政政策作为审判依据;二是将行政政策作为审查对象;三是行政政策既是审判依据,,又是审查对象。目前,我国法律中并无法院可适用行政政策的依据,但实践中已较多出现法院适用行政政策的现象。法律依据的缺失与实务操作的适用,造成了我国行政政策适用的尴尬局面。我国政策在法院的适用具有合理性与特殊性,新的《行政诉讼法》修正案(草案)中对规范性文件司法审查权的设想,同样适用于行政政策。具体来说,通过确立行政政策在行政诉讼适用中的审查对象与审判依据的合理地位,并建立判例指导制度,对于司法公正、行政权监督、权利救济都具有重要意义。
[Abstract]:Due to the acceleration of social development, the law is limited by its stability and has a certain backwardness. The policy, which is also used as a political management tool, is different from the law because of its characteristics. In today's society, it plays a more and more important role. As a branch of policy in the field of administration, administrative policy with legal significance, The application of administrative policy mainly refers to the application as the basis of the adjudication and the application as the object of review, and there is no judicial review system for the administrative policy in our country. The experience of western countries is of great significance to our country. There are three main ways to apply administrative policy in court: one is to take administrative policy as the basis of trial, the other is to take administrative policy as the object of examination. Third, administrative policy is not only the basis of trial, but also the object of review. At present, there is no basis for the court to apply administrative policy in Chinese law. However, in practice, there have been many phenomena of courts applying administrative policies. The lack of legal basis and the application of practical operations have caused an awkward situation in the application of administrative policies in China. The application of Chinese policies in the courts is of rationality and particularity. The assumption of the right of judicial review of normative documents in the new Amendment to the Administrative procedure Law (draft) also applies to administrative policy. It is of great significance for judicial justice, administrative power supervision and right relief to establish the reasonable status of the object of examination and the basis of trial of administrative policy in the application of administrative litigation, and to establish the system of legal precedent guidance.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前7条

1 袁明圣;公共政策在司法裁判中的定位与适用[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2005年01期

2 周佑勇;尹建国;;行政裁量的规范影响因素——以行政惯例与公共政策为中心[J];湖北社会科学;2008年07期

3 周永坤;论法官查找法律的权力[J];法学;2004年04期

4 ;最高人民法院人民法院第二个五年改革纲要(2004—2008)[J];中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报;2005年12期

5 方洁;;论行政法的不成文法源[J];公法研究;2002年00期

6 曾娜;;公共政策在法院审判中的适用[J];法治研究;2012年09期

7 张弘;赵方圆;;政策在行政诉讼中的适用研究[J];北方法学;2014年01期



本文编号:1665945

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1665945.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户fac73***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com