比例原则视域下电子侦查取证程序性规则构建

发布时间：2018-03-27 10:26

本文选题：电子证据　切入点：正当程序　出处：《环球法律评论》2017年01期

【摘要】：从程序正义的角度出发,犯罪侦查取证行为应当在打击犯罪与保障公民基本权利之间遵循比例原则。比例原则要求侦查取证行为满足四项基本要求,即目的正当性要求、手段目的匹配要求、谦抑性要求、成本收益平衡要求。四项要求层层递进,形成电子取证行为一整套内在逻辑自洽的程序性规范体系。电子证据的自身特性一方面使其成为一种独立的证据类型,另一方面这些特性也对基于比例原则四项基本要求所形成的传统侦查取证规则构成挑战。法律规范对于挑战的应对之策应当在比例原则的基本框架下进行,其中关键在于以个人权利受干预之程度为标准细化电子证据分类,并在此分类基础上明确取证行为的合理界限,为衡量权利干预之正当性提供评价标准。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of procedural justice, criminal investigation and forensics should follow the principle of proportionality between cracking down on crime and safeguarding citizens' basic rights. The principle of proportionality requires that the investigation and collection of evidence satisfy four basic requirements, namely, the requirement of objective legitimacy. The requirement of matching the purpose of means, the requirement of modesty, the requirement of cost-benefit balance. The four requirements are progressive step by step. Forming a whole set of internal logical self-consistent procedural norms system of electronic forensics. On the one hand, the characteristics of electronic evidence make it an independent type of evidence. On the other hand, these characteristics also pose a challenge to the traditional rules of investigation and evidence based on the four basic requirements of the principle of proportionality. The legal norm's response to the challenge should be carried out within the basic framework of the principle of proportionality. The key is to refine the classification of electronic evidence according to the degree of individual right intervention, and on the basis of this classification, to define the reasonable limits of evidence collection behavior, and to provide evaluation criteria for measuring the legitimacy of right intervention.
【作者单位】：北京航空航天大学法学院;
【基金】：2016年北京市社会科学基金项目“网络犯罪电子证据原理探析与规则构建”(16FXC026)的研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】