论我国第三人撤销之诉制度

发布时间：2018-03-29 01:17

  本文选题：第三人撤销之诉　切入点：实体权益　出处：《天津师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：新民事诉讼法中第五十六条第三款新增了“第三人撤销之诉”。作为本次民事诉讼法修改中增设的一种新的诉讼程序和诉讼种类,引起了民事诉讼法学界的广泛探讨,因此深入剖析第三人撤销之诉制度的法律内涵,揭示该制度如何在法律实务中更好的具体运用便成为一种必然。 本文从结构上分为三大部分,具体包括引言、正文和结语。其中正文分为五章,第一章主要分析了第三人撤销之诉的基础理论,具体包括第三人撤销之诉适用的前提条件、适格主体、诉讼标的、提起的期限及管辖法院,旨在更好的理解第三人撤销之诉制度的法律规定以及理论基础。第二章是对我国第三人撤销之诉制度的性质界定,根据第三人撤销之诉的内涵分析和理论界的通说,学者们一般认为我国的第三人撤销之诉制度属于形成之诉的范围,而且是一种事后的程序保障制度和非常救济制度。第三章是第三人撤销之诉制度与我国相关制度的比较。通过研究我国新设立的第三人撤销之诉制度与我国的案外人申请再审制度、执行程序中的案外人异议之诉制度的异同点,更好的理解第三人撤销之诉作为一种事后保障程序的法律性质以及价值追求。第四章是我国第三人撤销之诉制度与域外国家和地区的第三人撤销之诉制度的比较,主要是对法国案外人异议之诉、台湾地区第三人撤销之诉制度和澳门地区的第三人撤销之诉制度的异同点分析,以此更加深入全面的理解第三人撤销之诉制度的现实需求以及我国民事诉讼法设立此制度的必要性。第五章是第三人撤销之诉制度在我国法律实务界的具体运用,通过广东省高级人民法院(2013)粤高法立民终字第401号案件为例,全面分析第三人撤销之诉制度在我国司法实践中的具体运用,并针对第三人撤销之诉在实务中出现的问题提出笔者的看法。这一部分的内容不仅仅是针对第三人撤销之诉制度在本案例中出现的问题进行分析,也对以后的司法实践中预期可能出现的一些问题进行研究,以期为我国在未来的法律实务运作中提供参考和借鉴,从而更好的推动我国的司法制度建设。
[Abstract]:Article 56, paragraph 3, of the new civil procedure law adds "the action of revocation of the third party". As a new procedure and kind of action added in the revision of the civil procedure law, it has caused extensive discussion in the field of civil procedural law. Therefore, it is inevitable to deeply analyze the legal connotation of the system of the third party's revocation, and to reveal how the system can be better applied in the practice of law. This article is divided into three parts from the structure, including the introduction, the text and the conclusion. The text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter mainly analyzes the basic theory of the third party revocation action, including the specific conditions of the application of the third party revocation action. In order to better understand the legal provisions and the theoretical basis of the system of the third party's revocation, the second chapter defines the nature of the system of the third party's revocation in our country, which is the subject of the suit, the object of the lawsuit, the time limit of filing, and the jurisdiction of the court, in order to better understand the legal provisions and the theoretical basis of the system. According to the analysis of the connotation of the third party's revocation action and the general theory of the theoretical circle, scholars generally think that the system of the third party's revocation action in our country belongs to the scope of the formed action. The third chapter is the comparison between the system of the third party's revocation and the related system of our country. By studying the newly established system of the third party's revocation in our country and the case of our country, it is a kind of procedural safeguard system and extraordinary relief system. The system of application for retrial by outsiders, The similarities and differences of the system of dissenting action by outsiders in the execution procedure, The fourth chapter is the comparison between the third party revocation action system in China and the third party revocation action system in foreign countries and regions, and a better understanding of the legal nature and value pursuit of the third party revocation action as a kind of ex post facto safeguard procedure, the fourth chapter is the comparison between the third party revocation action system in China and the third party revocation action system in foreign countries and regions. It mainly analyzes the similarities and differences between the dissenting action of the outsider in the French case, the system of the third party's revocation in Taiwan and the system of the third party's revocation in Macao. The fifth chapter is about the practical application of the third party revocation action system in the legal practice of our country, and the necessity of establishing this system in our country's civil procedure law, the fifth chapter is the concrete application of the third party revocation action system in our country's legal practice. Taking Guangdong Provincial higher people's Court as an example, the author analyzes the specific application of the third party's revocation system in the judicial practice of our country. In this part, the author not only analyzes the problems of the third party revocation system in this case, but also puts forward the author's opinion on the third party revocation action in practice. In order to provide reference and reference for our country in the future legal practice, we can promote the construction of our judicial system better by studying some problems that may appear in the judicial practice in the future.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1
，

本文编号：1678910