当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

我国刑事庭前审查程序研究

发布时间:2018-03-29 02:01

  本文选题:刑事诉讼 切入点:庭前审查程序 出处:《北京理工大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:本文以2012年修订后的刑诉法的出台为契机,结合目前的司法实践来探讨我国刑事庭前审查程序存在的问题。庭前审查程序是连接公诉程序与审判程序的重要诉讼阶段,对整个诉讼程序的进行具有重要的影响。2012年刑事诉讼法的修改,使我国的庭前审查程序得到了进一步的发展,但仍然存在许多问题需要解决。因此,本文在对我国刑事庭前审查程序的现状进行分析的基础上,结合实际情况,提出相应的完善建议。 本文阐述了刑事庭前审查程序的相关概念和功能,继而对我国刑事庭前审查程序的现状进行研究,分析我国庭前审查程序存在的问题及原因;并通过对该程序进行域外考察,比较了大陆法系和英美法系的相关立法情况,得出了国外经验对我国的借鉴意义;最后,对构建我国的刑事庭前审查程序提出具体的完善建议:诸如对程序的重新定位、完善相应的运行机制、健全相关的配套措施等,从而使我国刑事庭前审查程序的价值真正有效地发挥出来,,实现审判的公正与高效。
[Abstract]:Based on the introduction of the revised Criminal procedure Law in 2012 and the current judicial practice, this paper discusses the problems existing in the criminal pretrial review procedure, which is an important litigation stage linking the public prosecution procedure with the trial procedure. The revision of the Criminal procedure Law in 2012 has further developed the pretrial review procedure in our country, but there are still many problems that need to be solved. Based on the analysis of the present situation of the criminal pretrial review procedure in China and the actual situation, this paper puts forward corresponding suggestions for perfection. This paper expounds the relevant concepts and functions of the criminal pretrial review procedure, then studies the present situation of the criminal pretrial review procedure in China, analyzes the problems and causes of the pretrial review procedure in our country, and makes an extraterritorial investigation of the procedure. This paper compares the relevant legislation of the civil law system and the common law system, and draws the reference meaning of the foreign experience to our country. Finally, it puts forward the concrete perfect suggestion to construct the criminal pretrial review procedure of our country, such as the reorientation of the procedure. In order to make the value of the pretrial examination procedure of our country play out effectively and realize the justice and efficiency of the trial, we should perfect the corresponding operating mechanism, perfect the relevant supporting measures and so on.
【学位授予单位】:北京理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前7条

1 韩红兴;;我国刑事公诉审查程序的反思与重构[J];法学家;2011年02期

2 谢安平;;论刑事庭前审查程序的价值——兼论我国庭前审查程序的完善[J];河北法学;2007年09期

3 郭建坡;赵春秀;;刑事证据开示制度的价值基础及法律重构[J];河北法学;2010年04期

4 李健;;刑事诉讼庭前证据开示制度的价值分析与构建路径[J];河北法学;2012年08期

5 王书庵;;对我国建立刑事证据开示制度的思考[J];湖南科技学院学报;2010年06期

6 晏向华,彭颖;也谈我国刑事庭前审查程序改革[J];人民检察;2003年04期

7 孙长永;;刑事证据开示制度的价值新探[J];人民检察;2009年08期



本文编号:1679037

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1679037.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3ba5c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com