强制证人出庭作证机制研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 20:06

本文选题：强制证人出庭　切入点：法律制裁　出处：《湘潭大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：针对证人出庭难，，不出庭的问题，2013年1月1日正式实施的《刑事诉讼法》确立了强制证人出庭作证制度，试图通过对无正当理由拒证的证人适用强制措施以保障证人出庭。笔者以该立法背景为基础，分析了强制证人出庭作证措施的性质，强制证人出庭作证措施作为一种诉讼法上的制裁措施，因其强制性、惩戒性饱受争议。事实上，无论是从证人出庭作证行为的性质、制度的可行性还是从强制的必要性分析，强制证人出庭作证制度出台的合理性是无可厚非的。尽管我国现行的强制证人出庭作证制度在立法上有了较大的突破，但相较国外的相关规定仍稍显不足，通过比较研究，与其他国家相关制度进行类比，结合我国的具体规定，我们发现我国强制证人出庭作证的实现方式在种类上、制裁力度上都存在着改进的空间，基于此丰富强制证人出庭作证措施的种类，将拒证行为入罪成为了应对我国立法缺陷的良策。同时，通过实证调查，笔者指出，强制证人出庭作证制度在我国面临着失灵的危机，而卷宗中心主义、法官强大的控制权、“结果中心主义”诉讼观，则是造成强制证人出庭作证立法与实践反差的祸首。在整个中国司法体制不变革的框架下，如不推进审判方式改革，削弱法官的程序控制权、改革庭前审查制度，强制证人出庭作证制度立法与实践的差异难以化解。总之，为了确保我国强制证人出庭作证制度的有效适用，不仅需要借鉴域外的经验，还需要依据我国国情，完善相关立法，改革司法体制，建立社会主义法治社会。
[Abstract]:According to witnesses, the problem does not appear in court, the criminal procedure law on January 1, 2013 the formal implementation of the "establishment of a mandatory witness system, through the application of compulsory measures for refusing to testify without justifiable reasons to protect witnesses witnesses to the court. On the basis of the legislative background, analyzes the nature of compulsory measures of witness testimony, witness as a procedural sanctions forced witnesses, because of its mandatory disciplinary controversial. In fact, both in nature and behavior from the testimony of witnesses, the feasibility of the system is analyzed from the necessity for the forced witness system introduced in rationality. Although I witness no ground for blame our current witness system has made significant breakthroughs in the legislation, but the relevant provisions compared with foreign countries is still slightly less than, through a comparative study with other countries. The analogy system, combined with the specific provisions of our country, we found that China's compulsory witness implementation in nature, sanctions are improved, the rich kinds of measures to testify the witness based on the witness crime has become the effective means to deal with deficiencies in China's legislation. At the same time, through empirical investigation, the author pointed out that the forced witness system is facing the failure of crisis in our country, and file centralism, judges the right to control the strong, "the center" concept of litigation, is caused by the failure to testify the legislation and practice of contrast. The witness framework does not change throughout the China judicial system next, if not to promote the reform of the trial, weaken the right of controlling the procedure, the reform of pretrial review system, the witness testifying system between legislation and practice it is difficult to resolve. In a word, in order to To ensure the effective application of the compulsory witness system to testify in court, we need not only to learn from other countries' experience, but also to perfect relevant legislation according to our national conditions, reform the judicial system and establish a socialist rule of law society.

【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】