审判中心论的话语体系分歧及其解决

发布时间：2018-04-09 20:29

本文选题：审判中心主义　切入点：以审判为中心　出处：《法学研究》2017年05期

【摘要】："审判中心主义"是中国学者在进行刑事诉讼制度的比较研究时,提炼出的理论术语;然后以此为参照,对中国的刑事诉讼制度进行类型化描述,开展相应的对策研究。"以审判为中心"则是在当代中国刑事司法改革实践的语境中,由改革决策层、执行部门提出的统括性术语;它旨在解决刑事错案频发、司法公信力不足等现实问题,是推进严格司法的工具性举措之一。这两种话语体系都指向中国的刑事诉讼制度改革,但它们在制度愿景、改革内容、价值定位、推进路径等方面存在诸多分歧。这些分歧导致理论研究和改革实践之间发生错位,使法学理论与法律实务无法就相应改革议题形成有效互动、共识与合力推进。一个或许可行的解决方案是,让二者共享建构性的刑事诉讼法教义学立场,竞争性地为刑事诉讼制度演进提供发展动力和解释框架。
[Abstract]:"trial centralism" is a theoretical term abstracted by Chinese scholars in the comparative study of the criminal procedure system, and then it is used as a reference to describe the criminal procedure system of China by type and carry out the corresponding countermeasure research. ""taking trial as the center" is an omnibus term put forward by the reform decision makers and executive departments in the context of the practice of criminal justice reform in contemporary China. It aims to solve the practical problems such as the frequent occurrence of criminal error cases and the lack of judicial credibility, etc.It is one of the instrumental measures to promote strict administration of justice.These two discourse systems both point to the reform of criminal procedure system in China, but there are many differences in system vision, reform content, value orientation, promotion path and so on.These differences lead to the dislocation between the theoretical research and the reform practice, which makes the legal theory and the legal practice unable to interact effectively on the corresponding reform issues, and promote the consensus and the joint force.One possible solution is to share the constructive position of the doctrine of criminal procedure law and to provide a competitive development power and interpretation framework for the evolution of the criminal procedure system.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学法学院;国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心;
【基金】：作者承担的2016年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“审判中心主义改革与证据法调控”(16YJC820005)的成果之一
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】