关于裁判文书说理责任制度构建的思考

发布时间：2018-04-10 00:12

  本文选题：说理责任　切入点：制度理性　出处：《法律适用》2017年23期

【摘要】：裁判文书说理责任是一种司法责任。三大诉讼法及其司法解释中有关裁判文书说理责任的规定不够平衡和系统,尤其缺乏配套的保障机制。从说理规律出发进行分析,说理责任制度存在双重核心:一是围绕"裁判结论"进行说理,履行最高目标责任;二是针对"争议焦点"进行说理,履行最低目标责任。立足于当前司法改革背景,应当建立健全裁判文书说理责任的系列保障机制:以说理公开条款保障说理责任到位,以说理权力条款促进说理主体有为,以说理目标、标准条款提升说理整体水平,以考核激励措施条款调动说理积极性,以内外部评价条款促进说理效果实现。
[Abstract]:The judgment document reasoning responsibility is a kind of judicial responsibility.The provisions of the three procedural laws and their judicial interpretations on the reasoning responsibility of the adjudicative documents are not balanced and systematic, especially lack of supporting safeguard mechanism.Proceeding from the law of reasoning, the system of reasoning responsibility has dual core: one is to reason around "judgment conclusion" to fulfill the highest objective responsibility; the other is to reason about "dispute focus" and fulfill the lowest objective responsibility.Based on the background of the current judicial reform, we should establish and improve the series of safeguard mechanisms of the reasoning responsibility of the judgment document: to protect the reasoning responsibility with the argument open clause, to promote the reasoning subject with the reasoning power clause, and to aim at the reasoning.The standard clause promotes the overall level of reasoning, motivates the enthusiasm of reasoning by examining the terms of incentive measures, and promotes the effect of reasoning by the provisions of internal and external evaluation.
【作者单位】： 河南财经政法大学;中国法学会法律文书学研究会;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“裁判表达的现实图景与制度重构”(12YJA820098)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926.13
，

本文编号：1728791