刑事案卷:文本的规范与程序的控制

发布时间：2018-04-10 01:28

本文选题：刑事案卷　切入点：审判方式　出处：《西南民族大学学报(人文社科版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：由于历史和现实的原因,我国刑事审判仍是一种严重依赖案卷材料的书面审判方式,这与我国当前推进的以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革存在尖锐冲突。这一冲突难以从制度上通过对案卷材料的"休克疗法"或所谓的调和路径加以解决。从相对合理主义的角度看,坚持平衡司法现实需要与程序正义价值诉求的原则,着手于刑事案卷制度本身的建设以适应实质化刑事审判方式改革需要可能更为稳妥。刑事案卷制度的建设涉及对案卷文本界定、文本生成机制和案卷运行的程序性制约机制的建立,由此形成刑事案卷生成、运行的标准性和限制性规范,从而增强刑事案卷运用的合理性和可靠性,实现刑事审判程序正义价值。
[Abstract]:Due to the historical and practical reasons, the criminal trial in China is still a kind of written trial method which relies heavily on the file materials, which conflicts sharply with the current reform of the trial centered litigation system in our country.This conflict is difficult to resolve institutionally through "shock therapy" or so-called reconciliation pathways to file materials.From the point of view of relative rationalism, it may be more prudent to adhere to the principle of balancing the need of judicial reality and the value demand of procedural justice, and to proceed with the construction of the criminal case file system itself to meet the needs of the reform of substantive criminal trial mode.The construction of the criminal file system involves the definition of the file text, the establishment of the text generation mechanism and the establishment of the procedural restriction mechanism for the operation of the case file, thus forming the standard and restrictive norms for the criminal file generation and operation.In order to enhance the rationality and reliability of criminal file application, realize the justice value of criminal trial procedure.
【作者单位】：云南大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“技术审判原理下的刑事卷证本体与制度研究”(13AFX013) 教育部人文社会科学规划项目“法院案件管理机制实证研究——以刑事审判为中心”(12YJA820050)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】