论刑事附带民事诉讼和解协议中过分赔偿

发布时间：2018-04-11 21:58

本文选题：和解协议 + 过分赔偿　；参考：《黑龙江大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：由于民事诉讼与刑事附带民事诉讼对人身权保护方式及范围不同,两种诉讼模式下对同一权利救济往往会得到不同的结果。在侵权行为构成刑事犯罪时,被害人一般都会选择刑事附带民事诉讼的方式实现权利的保护,在这一诉讼中,有的被害人或其家属利用被告人追求从轻处罚的心理,索要高额的赔偿,达成和解协议。这种协议过分赔偿,被告人或其家属非自愿进行的,而是在不赔偿将无法从轻处罚的压力下而为之的,这就违背了民事行为自愿的原则,也是对被告人的变相处罚。附带民事诉讼和解协议过分赔偿与不当得利、可变更、可撤销行为以及敲诈勒索在构成要求、行为属性上有着明显的区别,因此在司法实践中应当慎重处理这种当事人基于恶意而获得的过分赔偿。
[Abstract]:Because the way and scope of personal rights protection are different between civil litigation and criminal incidental civil action, the relief to the same right often gets different results under two kinds of litigation modes.When the tort constitutes a criminal offence, the victim generally chooses the criminal incidental civil action to realize the protection of the right. In this lawsuit, some victims or their families take advantage of the psychology of the defendant to pursue a lighter punishment.Ask for high compensation and reach a settlement.This kind of agreement excessively compensates, the defendant or its family member carries on involuntarily, but under the pressure that does not compensate will not be able to light punishment, this has violated the civil behavior voluntary principle, also is to the defendant disguised punishment.There are obvious differences between excessive compensation and improper enrichment, alterable, revocable behavior and extortion in the settlement agreement of incidental civil action.Therefore, in judicial practice, such parties should be careful to obtain excessive compensation based on malice.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】