第三人撤销之诉之原告适格问题分析

发布时间：2018-04-12 00:17

本文选题：第三人撤销之诉 + 原告资格　；参考：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：2012年我国新的民诉法出台,其中一个令人瞩目的修法举措就是回应实务需求,颁行了第三人撤销之诉制度。该制度设立的主要目的是为了打击实践中虚假诉讼、恶意诉讼等诉讼不诚信行为。其中尤为典型的实例就是当事人互相勾结,故意虚构债务,提起诉讼,通过法院的生效判决达到转移财产,损害第三方合法权益的目的。当第三人发现生效判决侵犯其合法权益且找不到合适救济途径时,此时第三人面对代表国家强制力的生效判决文书就显得十分无助。为保障因此受损的第三人,在法律应对方面,除了完善证据制度,惩治违法行为外,立法者也希望通过引进第三人撤销之诉,从程序上救济利益受损的第三人。但由于立法比较仓促,与其他制度的衔接上不够周延,使得这一制度在适用上存在一定困难。这一制度能否充分适用以发挥其功效,一个焦点问题就是其适格原告的范围确定问题。本文从应然和实然两个角度探讨第三人撤销之诉的适格原告问题,结合法国、台湾关于此制度的规定,分析我国大陆地区第三人撤销之诉的特点以及存在的缺陷,并以此为基础对我国的第三人撤销之诉的原告资格问题提出建言。
[Abstract]:In 2012, a new civil action law was introduced in our country, one of which is to respond to the demand of practice and to enact the system of third party revocation.The main purpose of this system is to combat dishonesty in practice, such as false litigation and malicious litigation.The typical example is that the parties colluded with each other, deliberately fictitious debts, filed a lawsuit, through the effective judgment of the court to transfer property and damage the legitimate rights and interests of third parties.When the third party finds that the effective judgment infringes on his legal rights and interests and cannot find a suitable remedy, then the third party is helpless in the face of the effective judgment document which represents the national coercive power.In order to protect the third party who is injured, besides perfecting the evidence system and punishing the illegal act, the legislator also hopes to remedy the third party whose interests are damaged by introducing the third party to withdraw the lawsuit.However, due to the short-term legislation and inadequate convergence with other systems, there are some difficulties in the application of this system.Whether this system can be fully applied in order to exert its effect, one of the key issues is the determination of the scope of its qualified plaintiff.In this paper, the author discusses the suitable plaintiff of the third party's revocation action from the angle of ought and reality, and analyzes the characteristics and defects of the third party's revocation action in the mainland of China, combining with the regulations of France and Taiwan on this system.On the basis of this, the author puts forward suggestions on the plaintiff's qualification of the third party's revocation in our country.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】