当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

我国附条件不起诉制度之完善研究

发布时间:2018-04-12 13:41

  本文选题:附条件不起诉 + 适用困境 ; 参考:《暨南大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:2012年3月14日,11届人大五次会议表决通过修改新刑事诉讼法的决定,其中新法增设第五编中有关未成年人刑事诉讼程序也引起了广泛的关注。附条件不起诉制度立法初衷是为了更好地教育、感化、挽救未成年人,是司法恢复正义理论的实践体现。但现行制度的设计与原先的想法略有出入,存在一定的适用困境:当事人一方的异议权与让未成年人及其家属无辜认罪难以体现“教育、感化、挽救”的方针;有限的适用范围、加害人与被害人和解无妥当保障等问题并未体现制度设计对未成年人的优待;过长的考验期不符合非刑事化改造理念;帮辅制度存在未成年人信息保护和受教育的问题。现存适用困境的解决方法需要借鉴域外的相关制度,汲取美、日、德三国中相关制度以及配套制度的精华。文章在最后一部分提出附条件不起诉制度完善的三大理念(司法平等、和解调处纠纷、保护未成年人隐私)以及从立法、司法层面去完善现有制度的不足之处,以更好地提升附条件不起诉制度的适用。
[Abstract]:On March 14, 2012, the Fifth session of the 11th session of the National people's Congress passed the decision to amend the new Criminal procedure Law, in which the addition of the fifth part of the New Law on the Criminal procedure of minors has also aroused widespread concern.The original intention of conditional non-prosecution legislation is to better educate, influence and save minors, which is the practical embodiment of justice theory of judicial restoration.However, the design of the current system is slightly different from the original idea, and there are some difficulties in its application: the right of dissent of one party and the innocent confession of minors and their families are difficult to embody the policy of "education, influence and rescue";In the limited scope of application, such problems as reconciliation between the offender and the victim without proper protection do not reflect the preferential treatment of minors in the system design, and the prolonged test period does not conform to the idea of non-criminal transformation;There are problems of information protection and education for minors in the auxiliary system.The existing solutions to the dilemma need to draw lessons from the relevant systems of the United States, Japan and Germany, as well as the essence of the supporting systems.In the last part of the article, the author puts forward the three main ideas of perfecting the system of non-prosecution with conditions (judicial equality, conciliation and mediation, protecting the privacy of minors) and the deficiencies of the existing system from the legislative and judicial levels.In order to better promote the application of conditional non-prosecution system.
【学位授予单位】:暨南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 莫洪宪;;改革开放以来我国刑事政策总体评估和启示[J];东方法学;2008年05期

2 王利明;;隐私权概念的再界定[J];法学家;2012年01期

3 孙应征;赵慧;;论刑事和解在我国相对不起诉制度中的构建[J];法学评论;2007年02期

4 汪建成;;论未成年人犯罪诉讼程序的建立和完善[J];法学;2012年01期

5 ;缓诉在未成年人案件中的地位及运用[J];青少年犯罪问题;1995年01期

6 上海市高级人民法院课题组;张海棠;;未成年人司法保护公平性若干问题研究[J];青少年犯罪问题;2012年01期

7 柯葛壮;;附条件不起诉中“异议”权之保障[J];法学;2013年01期

8 叶肖华;;比较法视域下的附条件不起诉制度[J];金陵法律评论;2007年02期

9 尹田;论人格权的本质——兼评我国民法草案关于人格权的规定[J];法学研究;2003年04期

10 陈光中;;关于附条件不起诉问题的思考[J];人民检察;2007年24期



本文编号:1739988

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1739988.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e4131***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com