刑事诉讼中公检法三机关间的“共议格局”——一种组织社会学解读

发布时间：2018-04-12 17:32

  本文选题：共议格局 + 公检法关系　； 参考：《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：当下中国的司法体制中,公检法三机关的"共议格局"已经成为一种制度化的非正式行动,这是三机关在长期的互动中逐步形成的、与正式制度相脱离、旨在得到相互认同与支持的行动策略和规则。同样的规范结构、以"成绩为中心"的刑事司法考评结构、对应化与人缘化的组织空间结构是其形成的主要原因。实践中"共议格局"表现为检察机关纠正法院违法适用时的"不确定性"、逆向运转的刑事诉讼程序和稳定的刑事抗诉率。"共议格局"的本质是法院外部组织场域的结构化,故镶嵌其中的法院改革是一种全方位、多主体的整体规划和设计,这可以从组织互动的角度为司法改革提供新的视角。
[Abstract]:In the current judicial system in China, the "co-discussion pattern" of the three organs of the Public Security Bureau, the Procuratorate and the Court has become an institutionalized informal action, which has gradually formed in the long-term interaction of the three organs and separated from the formal system.Strategies and rules of action aimed at mutual recognition and support.The main reason of its formation is the same normative structure, the criminal judicial evaluation structure centered on achievement, corresponding to the organizational space structure of humanization.In practice, the "co-discussion pattern" is manifested by the procuratorial organs'"uncertainty" in correcting the illegal application of the court, the reverse operation of the criminal procedure and the stable criminal protest rate. "The essence of the co-discussion pattern is the structure of the external organization field of the court, so the court reform embedded in it is a kind of all-around, multi-subject overall planning and design, which can provide a new angle of view for the judicial reform from the angle of organizational interaction.
【作者单位】： 浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：国家“2011计划”司法文明协同创新中心项目资助
【分类号】：D925.2
，

本文编号：1740731