司法廉政视域下“两会”代表个案监督规范化思考

发布时间：2018-04-13 09:29

本文选题：廉政建设 + 司法廉政　；参考：《理论探索》2017年02期

【摘要】："两会"代表个案监督经历了从萌芽到兴盛再到相对衰弱的发展历程,在当前的司法实践中仍持续发挥作用。其在实践中长期存在和运行的顽强生命力,与"两会"代表个案监督本身所蕴含的司法廉政促进功能密切相关。然而,受立法模糊等因素的制约,"两会"代表个案监督在现实中呈现失范趋向,成为当前司法廉政建设的盲区。以"两会"代表个案监督的规范化推进司法廉政,仍需要从法院评价与法官考评机制构建、个案监督制式表格的运用、个案监督材料归档要求、个案监督档案制度建立等方面着手展开。
[Abstract]:The "two sessions" representative case supervision has experienced the development process from germination to prosperity and then to relative weakness, and has continued to play a role in the current judicial practice.The tenacious vitality of its existence and operation for a long time in practice is closely related to the function of promoting judicial integrity contained in the case supervision of the representatives of the two sessions.However, restricted by vague legislation and other factors, the "two sessions" on behalf of individual cases of supervision in reality showed a trend of anomie, becoming the blind zone of the construction of a clean and honest judicial system.It is still necessary to build up the mechanism of court evaluation and judge evaluation, to use the standard form of case supervision, and to file case supervision materials in order to promote judicial integrity through the standardization of case supervision on behalf of the "two sessions".Case supervision of the establishment of archives system and other aspects of the start.
【作者单位】：南京航空航天大学;江苏大学;
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】