论诉前财产保全制度实效性研究

发布时间：2018-04-13 11:22

本文选题：诉前财产保全 + 财产担保　；参考：《吉林财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国的财产保全制度是由诉前财产保全和诉中财产保全两部分构成,两者最大共同点在于都是为保障申请人的合法权益,法院对被申请人的相关财产所进行的临时性,限制性的举措。通过两者比较,笔者认为,立法中所规定的诉前财产保全制度对于保障当事人利益的影响更为深远一些,因为进行诉前财产保全可以使司法权提前介入民事纠纷领域,只要进行财产保全的当事人提供了价值相应的财产担保,符合进行诉前财产保全措施的必备要件,申请人则直接可向法院申请进行财产保全,以此来保障自己的合法权益,正因为司法权的提前介入,一方面会促使债务人迫于违法成本的增加,从而被迫主动的提前终止所要进行的违法行为,因民事争端止于诉讼程序开始前,司法资源得到了合理的节约。另一方面,假如被申请人没有放弃先前的违法行为,申请人可在进行了财产保全后的合理期间内进行诉讼,法院在经过审理后,一旦判决申请人胜诉后,法院的判决就可以得到顺利执行,这要归功于法院在诉前就对债务人的财产采取了临时,限制性的财产措施,因此也不再会出现“执行难”问题。全文共分为四部分。第一部分介绍诉前财产保全制度的基本范畴。从诉前财产保全制度的概念、与其他相关制度的比较,特征和效用方面进行阐述。第二部分阐述两大法系财产保全制度的比较与借鉴。首先分析比较两大法系财产保全有关制度的现状,然后总结出两大法系财产保全制度的共同点,通过分析总结,阐述两大法系的财产保全制度对我国民事诉讼法中诉前财产保全制度实效的启示。第三部分阐述对我国民事诉讼财产保全制度的现实考量。本论文以我国法院在进行审理民事财产保全案件中所出现的一些问题进行分析,发现其存在的缺陷并分析出相关的深层原因。第四部分是对我国诉前财产保全制度完善提出的建设性意见。通过介绍实现该制度完善的具体途径来对采取相关配套措施进行论述。
[Abstract]:The property preservation system of our country is composed of the property preservation before the lawsuit and the property preservation in the lawsuit. The most common point of both is that they are temporary in order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the applicant and the court to the relevant property of the respondent.Restrictive measuresThrough the comparison between the two, the author thinks that the pre-lawsuit property preservation system stipulated in the legislation has a more far-reaching effect on the protection of the interests of the parties, because the judicial power can be involved in the civil dispute field in advance.As long as the party involved in property preservation provides a corresponding property security with corresponding value, which conforms to the necessary requirements for property preservation measures before litigation, the applicant may apply directly to the court for property preservation in order to protect his legitimate rights and interests.It is precisely because of the early intervention of judicial power, on the one hand, that the debtor will be forced to force the increase in the cost of breaking the law, thus forcing the debtor to terminate the illegal act on its own initiative, because the civil dispute ends before the commencement of the proceedings.Judicial resources have been reasonably saved.On the other hand, if the respondent has not abandoned the previous illegal act, the applicant may take action within a reasonable period after the property preservation has been carried out, and after the court has tried, once the applicant has been judged successful,The judgment of the court can be executed smoothly, which is due to the temporary and restrictive property measures taken by the court against the debtor's property before the action, so that there will no longer be the problem of "enforcement difficulty".The full text is divided into four parts.The first part introduces the basic category of property preservation system before litigation.This paper expounds the concept, characteristics and utility of property preservation system before litigation.The second part expounds the comparison and reference of the property preservation system between the two legal systems.First of all, it analyzes and compares the current situation of the property preservation systems in the two major legal systems, and then summarizes the common points of the property preservation systems in the two major legal systems.This paper expounds the enlightenment of the property preservation system of the two legal systems to the actual effect of the property preservation system before litigation in the civil procedure law of our country.The third part elaborates the realistic consideration to our country civil lawsuit property preservation system.This paper analyzes some problems in the trial of civil property preservation cases in Chinese courts, finds their defects and analyzes the underlying causes.The fourth part is the constructive suggestions on the perfection of property preservation system before litigation in China.Through the introduction of the system to improve the specific ways to take relevant measures to discuss.
【学位授予单位】：吉林财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】