当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

结构功能理论下家事纠纷解决机制研究

发布时间:2018-04-16 23:34

  本文选题:结构功能 + 家事纠纷 ; 参考:《重庆工商大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:家庭是社会生活的基本单位,家庭矛盾的处理关系到家庭的稳固,家和才能万事兴,家庭和谐与社会的协调发展息息相关。家事纠纷解决机制作为独立完整的一个社会系统,其结构的优化、功能的实现都需要一个基础理论保驾护航,结构功能理论下构建家事纠纷解决机制,能够实现社会资源整合,迎合家庭纠纷处理的特殊性,平和中化解矛盾,保温家人之间情感,恢复家庭和气,保障社会安定。对纠纷解决机制的研究离不开社会背景环境,家事纠纷解决机制的变迁脱离不开社会宏观结构的影响。长期的改革开放与市场经济,促使中国的经济结构、政治体制不断变革,多种矛盾交织涌现,社会紊乱成分增加不绝,纠纷解决机制作为处理纠纷、维护社会稳定的最后一道屏障,在新的时期应被政府纳入综合治理的构架之下。近年学者普遍关注纠纷解决机制的微观层面,如对个案调解及其调解模式、民间法与习惯法同国家法的关系等方面的研究,这些研究对构建我国新时期的纠纷解决机制有着不可藐觑的作用,但它们不免有些忽视宏观层面的研究,要知道事物一切的外部表象均与其内在深层结构存在千丝万缕的联系,所以本文正是从深层的社会结构开启研究,将视角着力在宏观层面。本文主要通过分析结构功能理论(主要指帕森斯时代)的基本内容和家事纠纷的基础理论入手,推演出家事纠纷解决机制构建的理论依据,分析我国家事纠纷独有的特点,总结出家事纠纷解决机制构建的社会实践依据。指出我国现有家事纠纷解决机制的问题,通过借鉴澳大利亚、德国等国家在处理家事纠纷方面的先进做法,结合结构功能理论的指导,探求我国家事纠纷解决机制的构建。本文通过文献研究,分析结构功能理论的基本内容和核心观点,为家事纠纷解决机制的构建提供具有理论意义的指导。通过逻辑分析法分析家事纠纷与其他民事纠纷的不同,结合我国现有家事纠纷处理机制的现状,提出具有针对性的完善意见。通过对澳大利亚、美国、德国等发达国家现有家事纠纷处理机制的研究,结合我国传统文化和新时期的价值观,提出构建我国家事纠纷解决机制的理论架构和部分实务改进措施。
[Abstract]:Family is the basic unit of social life. The settlement of family contradictions is closely related to the stability of family, family harmony and the harmonious development of society.As an independent and complete social system, the family dispute resolution mechanism needs a basic theory to guarantee the optimization of its structure and function. The construction of family dispute resolution mechanism under structure-function theory can realize the integration of social resources.It caters to the particularity of the family dispute resolution, resolves the contradiction in peace, preserves the emotion between the family and the family, recovers the family harmony and ensures the social stability.The research on the dispute settlement mechanism can not be separated from the social background environment, and the change of the family dispute settlement mechanism can not be separated from the influence of the macro structure of the society.The long-term reform and opening up and the market economy have prompted China's economic structure, political system to constantly change, a variety of contradictions intertwined and emerging, and the elements of social disorder have been increasing. The dispute resolution mechanism serves as a dispute resolution mechanism.The last barrier to social stability should be brought under the framework of comprehensive management in the new period.In recent years, scholars have generally paid attention to the micro level of dispute resolution mechanism, such as the case mediation and its mediation model, the relationship between folk law and customary law and national law, and so on.These studies play an important role in constructing the dispute resolution mechanism in the new period of our country, but they can't help but ignore the macro-level research. We should know that all external appearances of things are inextricably related to their inner and deep structure.Therefore, this paper starts the research from the deep social structure and focuses on the macro level.By analyzing the basic contents of the theory of structure and function (mainly referring to the Parsons era) and the basic theory of family disputes, this paper deduces the theoretical basis for the construction of the settlement mechanism of family disputes, and analyzes the unique characteristics of family disputes in our country.Summarizes the social practice basis for the construction of family dispute resolution mechanism.This paper points out the problems of the existing family dispute resolution mechanism in our country, and probes into the construction of the family dispute resolution mechanism of our country by referring to the advanced practices of Australia, Germany and other countries in dealing with the family dispute, combined with the guidance of the theory of structure and function.Through literature research, this paper analyzes the basic contents and core viewpoints of structural function theory, and provides theoretical guidance for the construction of family dispute resolution mechanism.This paper analyzes the differences between family disputes and other civil disputes by means of logical analysis. Combined with the present situation of domestic dispute handling mechanism in China, the author puts forward some suggestions for perfection.Through the research on the existing mechanism of handling family disputes in developed countries such as Australia, the United States, Germany, and other developed countries, combining the traditional culture of our country and the values of the new era,This paper puts forward the theoretical framework and some practical improvement measures of the family dispute resolution mechanism in China.
【学位授予单位】:重庆工商大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 曹思婕;;我国家事审判改革路径之探析[J];法学论坛;2016年05期

2 孙冯英;;纠纷解决中ADR思路的法理依据及其合理性分析[J];湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版);2016年01期

3 熊金才;;论婚姻家庭法立法价值取向的多元化——以法社会学为视角[J];中华女子学院学报;2015年06期

4 戴凌玉;;英美ADR纠纷解决机制的设立背景[J];法制博览;2015年23期

5 欧伟明;季如莉;;乡村社会结构变迁与民事纠纷解决路径选择[J];法制与社会;2015年15期

6 罗漂;;家事纠纷ADR机制的构建[J];韶关学院学报;2015年05期

7 蒋月;冯源;;台湾家事审判制度的改革及其启示——以“家事事件法”为中心[J];厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年05期

8 许少波;;家事纠纷类型化分析[J];江海学刊;2014年03期

9 董玉鹏;;结构功能理论下涉外知识产权纠纷诉调对接机制研究[J];知识产权;2013年06期

10 范愉;;诉讼社会与无讼社会的辨析和启示——纠纷解决机制中的国家与社会[J];法学家;2013年01期

相关博士学位论文 前3条

1 曾学智;社会学视野下的法治研究[D];武汉大学;2010年

2 来文彬;家事调解制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2010年

3 宋明;人民调解纠纷解决机制的法社会学研究[D];吉林大学;2006年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 易可;我国家事纠纷解决机制的完善[D];湘潭大学;2013年

2 常晓茗;传统家庭分工与现代社会参与的对立:女性角色内冲突[D];南京农业大学;2008年

3 孟慧;家事纠纷解决机制研究[D];中国政法大学;2008年

4 李s,

本文编号:1761098


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1761098.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3424e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com