对刑事诉讼中留有余地判决的反思

发布时间：2018-04-27 01:41

本文选题：留有余地 + 疑罪从无　；参考：《甘肃政法学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：伴随科技日新月异的发展,人们法律意识的逐渐加强,审判机关的压力也越来越大。案件的增多,案件本身的复杂性和特殊性,使得侦查、审判案件的不确定因素也在增加。近年来披露的一些冤案和错案使得大家将目光凝聚到非刑法理论上的一种裁决方式——“留有余地”的判决上。实践中司法机关为了实现法律效果和社会效果的统一,才寻求了“留有余地”的判决这一条“夹缝中求生存”的裁判方式。本文共分为三个部分,第一部分对留有余地判决概念进行了论述,以及该种判决的两个模式。再通过这类判决的个案考察分析,加深读者对留有余地裁判方式的理解。笔者找出两个典型案件来突出留有余地判决的两种模式,从而反映留有余地判决的社会效果和法律效果。第二部分主要分析了法院选择留有余地判决的原因,包括内部原因和外部原因两个方面。第三部分针对留有余地判决的走向提出自己的建议。留有余地的判决逐渐暴露出来的弊端使我们不得不反思它存在的必要性。虽然在实践中真正取消这种裁判方式还存在一定的阻碍,但我们仍应采取各种措施来消除这种判决。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology, people's legal consciousness is gradually strengthened, and the pressure of judicial organs is growing. The increasing number of cases and the complexity and particularity of the cases make the uncertain factors of investigation and trial increase. In recent years, some unjust cases and wrong cases have been disclosed, which makes people focus on a kind of adjudication method in theory of non-criminal law, that is, "leave room" judgment. In practice, in order to realize the unification of legal effect and social effect, the judicial organ has sought the judgment of "keeping room", which is the judgment way of "seeking survival in the gap". This paper is divided into three parts. In the first part, the concept of margin decision is discussed, and the two models of this kind of judgment are discussed. Through the case study and analysis of this kind of judgment, the reader's understanding of the margin of judgment is deepened. The author finds out two typical cases to highlight the two models of margin judgment, so as to reflect the social and legal effects of the margin judgment. The second part mainly analyzes the reasons for the court to choose the margin of judgment, including internal reasons and external reasons. The third part puts forward its own suggestions on the direction of the decision with leeway. The drawback of the margin judgment gradually exposes that we have to reflect on the necessity of its existence. Although there are still some obstacles in practice, we should take all kinds of measures to eliminate this kind of judgment.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】