民意参与司法的冲突和协调

发布时间：2018-04-27 11:03

本文选题：民意 + 司法　；参考：《淮北师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,从一些受到社会各界广泛关注的案件可以看到,民意对司法活动的影响正在逐步加深。它已经不仅表现在案件的审判环节,而且还贯穿于整个司法过程当中。民意虽然能够在一定程度上对司法活动提供的积极帮助,但是民意对司法消极影响也不可忽视。在司法实践中,民意与司法之间的冲突已经显而易见,如何能够更好地协调两者之间的关系,正是我们需要深入研究的重要问题,本文正是立足于当前司法实践的客观情况,通过对民意和司法关系的分析,尝试为协调民意和司法之间的关系提出对策和建议。本文内容分为五个部分:第一部分是绪论。通过对研究背景和意义的论述以及列举近年来广泛受到社会各界关注的热门案例,提出民意参与司法实践已经是毫无疑问的客观事实。接着详细阐述国内外的研究现状,指出本文的研究目的和民意参与司法所引发的一些问题。第二部分是对民意和司法的概念及特征的阐述。首先是详细论述民意的概念和特征,其次是论述司法的概念和特征,最后是举出一些经典案件进行具体分析和说明。第三部分是从理论依据和积极意义两个角度对民意参与司法的合理性进行论述,其中理论依据包括人民主权论、人本主义论和分权制衡论,积极意义则包括弥补法律的漏洞、促进司法公正、防止权力滥用、获得民意的支持和有效遏制司法腐败,这些都为民意参与司法提供了合理性依据。第四部分是分析民意参与司法的冲突性。首先是用典型的案例指出民意参与司法的冲突表现,主要是法律思维和道德思维的冲突、法律事实和民意认定的事实之间的冲突和程序正义与实体正义的冲突,然后再对冲突的原因进行系统的分析,最后是结合案例对民意参与司法的消极影响进行详细阐述,主要是妨碍司法公正、影响司法独立和损害司法权威。第五部分主要是探讨民意与司法的和谐互动机制。通过积极引导和回应民意、主动公开司法信息、加强裁判文书的说理、规范新闻媒体和舆论的监督、完善调解制度、推行案例指导以沟通民意和完善人民监督员制度等方式为民意参与司法构建和谐互动机制,缓解民意和司法之间的紧张关系。
[Abstract]:In recent years, it can be seen that the influence of public opinion on judicial activities is gradually deepening. It has been not only in the trial of the case, but also throughout the judicial process. Although public opinion can provide positive help to judicial activities to some extent, the negative influence of public opinion on judicature can not be ignored. In judicial practice, the conflict between public opinion and justice has become obvious. How to better coordinate the relationship between the two is an important issue that we need to study deeply. This paper is based on the objective situation of current judicial practice. Through the analysis of the relationship between public opinion and judicature, this paper tries to put forward some countermeasures and suggestions for coordinating the relationship between public opinion and judicature. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is an introduction. Through the discussion of the background and significance of the research and the enumeration of popular cases which have been concerned by various circles of society in recent years, the author points out that the participation of public opinion in judicial practice is an objective fact without any doubt. Then, the research situation at home and abroad is described in detail, and some problems caused by the participation of public opinion in the administration of justice are pointed out. The second part is to the public opinion and the judicial concept and the characteristic elaboration. Firstly, it discusses the concept and characteristics of public opinion in detail; secondly, it discusses the concept and characteristics of judicature; finally, it lists some classic cases for concrete analysis and explanation. The third part discusses the rationality of public opinion participation in the administration of justice from two angles of theoretical basis and positive significance. The theoretical basis includes the theory of people's sovereignty, the theory of humanism and the theory of separation of powers and checks and balances, and the positive meaning includes making up the loopholes of the law. Promoting judicial justice, preventing abuse of power, obtaining the support of public opinion and effectively curbing judicial corruption provide a reasonable basis for public opinion to participate in the administration of justice. The fourth part is to analyze the conflict of public opinion participation in the administration of justice. First of all, it points out the conflict performance of public opinion participation in justice with typical cases, mainly the conflict between legal thinking and moral thinking, the conflict between legal facts and the facts recognized by public opinion, and the conflict between procedural justice and substantive justice. Then the causes of the conflict are systematically analyzed, and finally the negative impact of public opinion participation in the administration of justice is elaborated in detail, which mainly hinders judicial justice, affects the independence of the judiciary and damages the judicial authority. The fifth part mainly discusses the harmonious interaction mechanism between public opinion and judicature. By actively guiding and responding to public opinion, actively publicizing judicial information, strengthening the reasoning of adjudication documents, standardizing the supervision of the news media and public opinion, and perfecting the mediation system, In order to alleviate the tension between the public opinion and the judiciary, the case guidance should be adopted in order to establish a harmonious and interactive mechanism for public opinion to participate in the administration of justice by means of communicating public opinion and perfecting the system of people's supervisors.
【学位授予单位】：淮北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】