论庭前会议功能失范之成因——从庭前会议决定的效力切入

发布时间：2018-04-27 19:55

本文选题：庭前会议 + 非法证据排除规则　；参考：《当代法学》2016年01期

【摘要】：2012年《刑事诉讼法》及其司法解释颁布实施以来,我国庭前会议制度功能失范的主要表现为:解决程序争议的功能失灵,组织庭前准备的功能失范,提高诉讼效益的功能也难以发挥。跳出庭前会议程序失灵的表象后,"庭前会议功能失范何以发生"成为了重要问题。目前看来,庭前会议决定的效力缺失是该程序功能失范的主要成因。其间的因果律为:决定的效力缺失,使程序争议拖延至一审庭审,对合议庭和被告人参与未形成有效激励,并导致当事人失去了救济方式。这给我们的启示是:告别"没有结论的裁判"。
[Abstract]:Since the "Criminal Procedure Law" and its judicial interpretation were promulgated and implemented in 2012, the main manifestations of the dysfunction of the pre court conference system in China are as follows: the function of the settlement of the procedural disputes is out of order, the functional anomie of the pre court preparation and the function of improving the efficiency of the litigation are difficult to play. After the appearance of the failure of the proceedings before the court, "what is the function of the pre court meeting is not good?" It seems to be an important problem. At present, the absence of the effect of the pre court meeting is the main cause of the failure of the procedure. The law of cause and effect is that the effect of the decision is missing, the procedural dispute is delayed to the trial of the first instance, the participation of the collegial panel and the defendant is not effectively encouraged, and the parties lose the way of relief. Our apocalypse is to say goodbye to "a referee without a conclusion".

【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“审判中心视角下的刑事、民事和行政诉讼制度改革研究”(14ZDC014)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】